Barnes Ends Legal Effort To Ease Its Restrictions

Posted: January 14, 1992

In a sudden about-face, the Barnes Foundation has jettisoned its 10-month- old legal effort to overturn restrictions on the foundation's visiting hours, investment policy, admission fee and the use of its Merion building for social functions.

The foundation, home of one of the world's pre-eminent impressionist and postimpressionist art collections, withdrew its petition in Montgomery County Orphans Court on Friday - just eight days before it would have had to produce detailed financial records justifying its requests.

The withdrawal came on the heels of another significant development in the case - a judge's decision Wednesday to allow attorneys for a group challenging the Barnes petition to question officials of the Samuel I. Newhouse Foundation and Lincoln University about a $2 million gift from the foundation to the university, which oversees the Barnes.

The gift last spring was followed by a milestone in the Barnes' history: the awarding of a contract to Alfred A. Knopf to publish two books, including a color catalogue, on the museum's collection of 800 paintings and 200 sculptures. The Barnes had never allowed such publications.

S.I. Newhouse Jr., chairman of Advance Publications, which owns Knopf, is the son of Samuel Newhouse.

Neither Richard H. Glanton, president of the Barnes, nor Thomas Timoney, the Barnes attorney, returned phone calls yesterday requesting comment on the petition's withdrawal.

But attorneys for two groups that had challenged the petition, the Violette de Mazia Trust and three Barnes art-education students, said they would not let the matter rest.

"It doesn't end it all. We're going to respond," said James R. Beam, who represents the De Mazia Trust, established by one of the chief proteges of Albert C. Barnes, the museum's founder.

William Bradbury, an attorney representing the students, said that there were two possible explanations for the petition's withdrawal. "Either the reason that they wanted the petition in the first place doesn't exist anymore - and I don't know why that would be the case - or it got too hot in the kitchen," he said.

Both the De Mazia Trust and the students say they are concerned with preserving art-education classes at the Barnes, which they say might be threatened by extended visiting hours. The museum, which charges $1 admission, is open on Fridays, Saturdays and Sunday afternoons.

Barnes, a lifetime foe of the art establishment, set up a trust containing innumerable restrictions on the foundation's operations - barring it from lending, selling or even moving its paintings, limiting its accessibility to the public and restricting investments to railroad and government securities.

In their March petition, the Barnes trustees sought relief from what they called "conditions contained in the trust which over the years have become impractical" and have contributed to "the frustration or defeat" of the foundation's mission to promote education and art appreciation.

Their most controversial request was to sell up to 15 paintings in order to raise money to repair the building - a request that was withdrawn in June after a barrage of criticism.

Nick Tinari, one of the three students challenging the Barnes petition, said the turnabout by the Barnes did not surprise him.

"I don't feel that they ever had any intention of producing these

documents," he said. "They let the case drag out until it was obvious

that they would have to deal with us . . . and would have to produce the

documents. . . .

"What they've said is, 'We are in dire straits and we have to change the rules,' " said Tinari, an electrical engineer from Broomall. "Now they're saying, 'We don't need to change the rules.' "

|
|
|
|
|