Still a pillar, says Campbell Despite firm's setback, "we want to stay."

January 17, 2008|By Troy Graham INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

Campbell Soup, the last Fortune 500 company in Camden, suffered a severe blow to its plans to create a 110-acre office park on the Admiral Wilson Boulevard when a judge invalidated its development plan this month.

But Campbell officials say the company is standing by the plan and the city that has been its home for 140 years - despite past warnings that it might move if the office park isn't approved.

Anthony Sanzio, Campbell's director of communications, said the company had maintained all along it would "consider all its options" if the plan didn't go through.

Story continues below.

"Of course, the first question out of the reporters' mouths is, 'Would you leave Camden?' " he said. "We've never threatened to leave. We want to stay. We're committed."

But standing in the way of Campbell's expansion is another Camden icon, albeit a dilapidated one - the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, a national historic landmark built in 1927.

The building, renowned for its Greek Revival-style architecture, mostly has been vacant since 1971, when Sears opened a department store in Moorestown.

Campbell's wants to raze the Sears building, which was bought last year by Dr. Denim, a Philadelphia clothing retailer. Preservationists and activists have vowed to stop the demolition.

"Why can't Campbell's build around it?" asked Frank Fulbrook, a Camden activist. "I see no reason why you can't have Dr. Denim and Campbell's being neighbors - and leave the Sears building alone."

Dr. Denim's owner, Ilan Zaken, did not return phone calls seeking comment on his plans. Fulbrook said Zaken planned to spend $1 million to rehab the space for warehousing, retail space and a recording studio.

According to Sanzio, experts hired by Campbell said that just making the Sears building habitable would cost $6 million; there are no working restrooms, the copper plumbing has been stripped, and rainwater pours through the roof.

But the building has gotten a reprieve thanks to a lawsuit Fulbrook filed. He argued that Camden Planning Board Chairman Rodney Sadler had a conflict of interest when he presided over an April meeting that approved Campbell's plan.

Sadler is a nonvoting member of the state's Economic Development Authority, which endorses Campbell's proposal.

Last week, Superior Court Judge Francis J. Orlando agreed that Sadler's participation was a conflict, even though Sadler recused himself from voting on the plan.

Campbell's can appeal Orlando's decision or ask the planning board to hear the matter again without Sadler.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|