Schools will fall into one of three categories - lowest performing; limited progress, which will get a one-year contract with the current provider, with an eye toward replacing the provider for the next school year; and positive progress, which will receive a one-year contract with an eye toward multi-year renewal.
A determination of where each school falls has not yet been made. They will be evaluated on a combination of student performance and school climate, officials said.
Sandra Dungee Glenn, commission chairwoman, said the recommendation was likely to carry at next week's voting meeting. She was an early opponent of the movement to turn schools over to private managers, but now considers herself an "agnostic," she said.
"By their nature, they are not a silver bullet to reform," Dungee Glenn said. "Where they work, we should learn from them and where they don't, we need to correct and move on."
Schools will be evaluated on an index that combines student performance, including test scores; and school climate, including safety, leadership and parent involvement.
The lowest-performing schools generally have high teacher turnover, unfocused professional development, many violent incidents, and limited parental involvement. They will be given extensive support by the district, officials said.
The next tier, the limited progress schools, will have increased direction from the school district next year.
Todd McIntire, general manager of Edison Schools Inc., the provider with the most schools at 20, said Edison is supportive of the recommendation.
"We applaud a school-by-school approach," said McIntire, who pointed out that the outside managers took the district's most troubled schools when the "diverse provider" experiment began in 2002.
Currently, 18,000 city schoolchildren attend the 38 schools run by outside managers.