Lottery has added a few wrinkles to NBA draft

June 25, 2009|By ED BARKOWITZ, barkowe@phillynews.com
Image 1 of 3
  • Robinson
  • Robinson
  • Duncan
  • Daugherty

LOOKING BACK on previous drafts is rarely fair to the clubs that select, but it's always fun. Hindsight's perfect vision allows even the most casual fan to wonder, "Wow. What if . . . "

The NBA upped the intrigue when it instituted its lottery 25 years ago.

Hatched in the summer of 1984, the system was enacted primarily to dissuade bad teams from tanking games to gain a higher pick in the subsequent draft. It also was brought about to try to dispel any appearance of such tomfoolery, which some would argue was as egregious as anything Tim Donaghy may or may not have pulled.

So while teams theoretically still can lose on purpose, they're not necessarily guaranteeing themselves favorable draft position.

The losingest teams still have the best chance to secure the top overall pick, but they no longer have the only chance. Though the weighting system has varied through the years, all non-playoff teams are given some sort of opportunity to end up with a player that could jumpstart a franchise. The Knicks, Spurs and Cavaliers are shining examples.

 

An interesting start

 

Conspiracy theorists have suggested the very first lottery in 1985 was rigged since it allowed the Knicks, who finished with a better record than four other teams during the regular season, to move up and select Patrick Ewing, one of greatest big men in college basketball history. The presumption was that the league always wants a successful team in New York, which would generate fan interest and TV ratings. Each of the seven non-playoff teams had an equal chance for the No. 1 pick, and there was speculation that the envelope containing the Knicks logo in 1985 was tampered with.

"I wish I had as much sway as the conspiracists attribute to me," commissioner David Stern recently told the Associated Press.

 

Hitting it biggest

 

When the Spurs hit it big in 1987, they were transformed from also-ran to contender. When they hit it again 10 years later, San Antonio became dominant.

1 | 2 | 3 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|