Statewide, just 28 percent like his state budget efforts. In Philly, 59 percent side with His Edness.
A slim majority of city voters (51 percent) - while living in the highest-taxed city in America and facing the prospect of an increased sales tax - support Ed's proposed 16 percent increase in the state personal-income tax.
Statewide, only one-third of folks support the hike, according to a poll of 1,173 Pennsylvania voters released yesterday.
The numbers tell a story of two states, a story that has dogged and helped define Rendell since he took office in 2003. He remains to many the mayor/governor of Philadelphia: to Philadelphians who still view him as savior of the city; to others who believe the city's all he cares about.
No other region of the state, for example, supports an increased personal-income tax, and I bet if Rendell's name wasn't on the question (it was polled as his proposal), Philly wouldn't support it, either.
But it does because it's him.
This Philly thing is a large part of why Rendell so often faces stumbling blocks when dealing with a Legislature largely representative of places other than Philly. His style, goals and priorities often separate him from the rest of the state. Think guns, gays, spending and taxes.
I don't doubt that the Guv's declining statewide approval reflects frustration with the overall economy.
At a news conference yesterday he dismissed the decline: "I'm here if my favorables drop to 10 percent," he said, "As long as I believe I'm doing the right thing, I don't care."
Why would he? He's a lame-duck incumbent who says he's done with public life when he leaves office after next year.
When I ask Peter Brown, Quinnipiac poll assistant director, if any numbers in the survey surprise him, he says, "Maybe the extent of the governor's drop [Ed's approval rating was 54 percent in May] . . . but that's going on around the country. Even President Obama's numbers are down."
I find two things interesting.