The real McNabb-Vick issue, though, isn't how Vick got here, it's what happens down the road.
You don't need a talent for the perverse to imagine how Vick's presence as a backup could backfire on McNabb. No, not so much the blah-blah you've been hearing all over that fans will be chanting Vick's name, should McNabb hit a 3-week rough patch, as happened last season. The upshot of McNabb's contract sweetening in June seemed to be a pledge from management that he would be allowed to work through any difficulties this time around.
But what happens if McNabb suffers, say, a 4-to-6 week injury in November, Vick takes the controls, and the team plays way better? Or, less far-fetched, what happens next offseason, if the Eagles still haven't won the Super Bowl with McNabb, Vick is completely recovered from his long absence, and all Marty Mornhinweg's drilling on mechanics actually shows signs of harnessing Vick's amazing potential?
McNabb said yesterday he is willing to take that risk, that he didn't see it as being so different from having Kevin Kolb, or previously, Jeff Garcia looking over his shoulder. (But, uh, Donovan, the Garcia thing, him leading the team to the 2006 playoffs after you tore your ACL, fans preferring Garcia - you and your family didn't much like that, remember? "Bittersweet" ring a bell?)
"I've been through many situations throughout my career where if I got injured or someone wasn't liking the way I was playing, they cheered for the backup . . . It happened with Garcia, it happened with Kolb, it happened with [A.J.] Feeley. So I'm used to that," McNabb said.