Changing Skyline: Struggle to make season bright on the square

November 13, 2009|By Inga Saffron, Inquirer Architecture Critic
(Page 3 of 3)

The Friends believe a director would do a better job of organizing events that are compatible with the square, while driving a harder bargain with sponsors to raise more money. Technically, the city is supposed to plow event fees back into the park, but Rosen would like to create "more transparency."

Striking the balance between public and private goals will be tricky. Should Rittenhouse Square allow a food concession? Franklin Square did, but it isn't surrounded by restaurants. If Rittenhouse Square goes private, it would be the third of the city's original four corners to give up on government. After Washington Square was taken by Independence National Historical Park, conditions improved greatly.

Story continues below.

The new management structure wouldn't be just about making money. Rosen can imagine setting aside space for yoga classes or a children's story hour. She wants to close the park's 18th Street side for occasional block parties with local restaurants.

Rittenhouse Square has long ceased to be just a neighborhood park. It's a great social meeting ground for the whole city. It should remain a place where residents and visitors can go and do nothing more than sit on a bench and enjoy a beautiful day.

 


Contact architecture critic Inga Saffron at 215-854-2213 or isaffron@phillynews.com.

 

« Prev | 1 | 2 | 3
|
|
|
|
|