Chester County kennel where Biden bought dog found not guilty of violations

June 15, 2010|By Kathleen Brady Shea, Inquirer Staff Writer
  • Vice President Biden holds his newly purchased puppy. He bought Champ, a German shepherd, in December 2008.

The owner of the Chester County kennel that sold Vice President Biden his dog, Champ, received her third not-guilty verdict for dog-law violations Monday in District Court.

Linda Brown, who runs JoLindy's German Shepherds - also known as Wolf Den Kennel - with her husband, Joseph Gauger, appeared before Bucktown District Judge James V. DeAngelo.

"I can't get beyond reasonable doubt," DeAngelo said regarding allegations that the food and sanitation of the couple's Spring City kennel ran afoul of the law.

Jeff Conrad, Brown's attorney, said after the hour-long hearing that state regulators have unfairly targeted Brown. She was found not guilty of citations issued in January and March 2009.

Story continues below.

"Ever since the vice president got his dog, she has been under a magnifying glass," said Conrad. "The scrutiny she has been under is ridiculous."

State dog-law officials dismissed that suggestion, pointing out that Brown's problems predated Biden's purchase in December 2008.

Sue West, director of the Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement, said the state was waiting for the conclusion of Monday's hearing before deciding what other action to take against JoLindy's regarding inspections performed in March and May.

According to those reports, wardens found "sharp metal, chewed wood and sharp chewed edgings" in and around the facility that could injure dogs, inadequate water supplies, and "several dead, decomposing rats" on the grounds.

During the hearing, David McKenzie, the assistant counsel for the bureau, presented testimony and photos from Joe Loughlin, the dog warden.

Loughlin said he observed that the raw chicken fed to the dogs "was mixed in with dog feces" and that one dog had blood running down its mouth that got in its water bowl.

Gauger testified that the concrete area where he throws the dogs' food is pressure-washed daily, a comment that prompted Conrad to argue that unless Loughlin visited the kennel the day before or the day after the Nov. 4 inspection, he could not prove a violation occurred.

That assertion and others prompted both lawyers and the judge to search for the relevant regulations, a task that proved challenging, since one section referred readers to another section. At one point, the judge asked McKenzie if he wanted a sticky-note to facilitate flipping from one section to another.

Brown testified that she and her husband were doing their best to comply with the dog regulations that went into effect in October 2009.

"Everything you do isn't good enough," she said.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|