Change of venue

Family Court's dire need for new quarters shouldn't be stymied by scandal surrounding the Center City project. A West Philadelphia site is a fine alternative.

July 09, 2010|By Inga Saffron, Inquirer Architecture Critic
Image 1 of 4
  • The Provident Mutual Insurance Co. building, at 46th and Market Streets is a potential site for a new Family Court.
  • The Provident Mutual Insurance Co. building, at 46th and Market Streets is a potential site for a new Family Court. (Tony Fitts)
  • The Domestic Relations building, which needs numerous repairs, as seen from S. 11th Street.
  • The Juvenile Court building at Logan Square.
  • A slide shows how a new courthouse wing could be attached to the back of the old Provident building, 46th and Market Sts.

In a narrow alley, just steps from Market Street's luxurious Loews Hotel, stands a nearly windowless building that is Philadelphia's own house of misery. The official name is Domestic Relations Court, and it is the broken heart of the city's Family Court system.

Perhaps you've seen it out of the corner of your eye while rushing over to Macy's or to Reading Terminal Market, and wondered about the harried souls queuing patiently in the alley. Most likely you kept walking. Domestic Relations isn't a place you visit unless you've been beaten up, cheated on, or neglected by the people who are supposed to love you the most.

Few would tag this former department store annex on 11th Street - once Snellenburg's men's store - as a state courthouse, a branch of the venerable Common Pleas Court's Family Division. Despite all the stories The Inquirer has run in the last two months about the scandal-plagued effort to construct a new Family Court, we haven't published a photograph of its Domestic Relations branch. Its more elegant sibling, the columned, neoclassical Juvenile Court next to the Free Library on Logan Square, gets all the face time. The same holds true on Family Court's Web page.

But the grim Domestic Relations operation is a big reason why so many people continue to advocate for the $200 million Family Court building at 15th and Arch Streets, despite the gusher of fees paid to Jeffrey B. Rotwitt, a rich and connected lawyer, and his developer partner, Donald Pulver.

Their millions in pre-construction payments might have covered some crucial improvements at the existing Juvenile Court, which currently has only a handful of working security cameras. Asbestos tile was raining from the ceiling in the DNA lab the day I visited, and workers wore blue face masks as they tapped at their computers.

Still, that building is a palace in comparison to Domestic Relations. At Juvenile Court, you walk through arched stone portals into a soaring lobby outfitted with murals from the 1930s promising a better life. At Domestic Relations, you run the same security gauntlet as shackled convicts.

1 | 2 | 3 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|