Battle being waged for control of Pitcairn real estate empire

August 29, 2010|By Harold Brubaker, Inquirer Staff Writer
Image 1 of 3
  • Bryn Athyn Cathedral is among the properties supported by the Pitcairn family.
  • Bryn Athyn Cathedral is among the properties supported by the Pitcairn family.
  • Above, Cairnwood Mansion in Bryn Athyn, home of the 19th-century industrialist John Pitcairn. It is now owned by the Academy of the New Church. Below, a room in the Glencairn Museum at Bryn Athyn College.

Pitcairn Properties, a Jenkintown real estate firm with ties to one of the region's wealthiest families, is fighting a takeover attempt by an investor group that placed $50 million with the company six years ago.

The tense and high-consequence battle has an intriguing cast: the blue-blooded Pitcairn clan; Eric L. Blum, a tenacious Philadelphia deal-maker; and former Main Line investment adviser Barry R. Bekkedam, now living in Florida after pouring $30 million of clients' money into a Ponzi scheme.

At stake is control of the $800 million Pitcairn real estate empire, which is heavily leveraged, as is common in the industry.

Pitcairn Properties Inc. is a separate company from Pitcairn Trust Co., which manages money for the Pitcairn family as well as for others.

Pitcairn Properties was founded in 1968 to diversify the wealth of the Pitcairn family, best known for its support of the General Church of the New Jerusalem and the grand Bryn Athyn Cathedral. The company has had, until recently at least, a reputation for working things out with partners.

The Pitcairns and other New Church families who own common stock in Pitcairn Properties are pitted against Blum, known in local financial circles for a shrewd, take-no-prisoners approach to protecting the money entrusted to him.

The dispute was spurred by Pitcairn Properties' failure, starting in September, to make four consecutive dividend payments and to meet a redemption request on the $50 million investment.

After months of negotiations amid a dreadful market for commercial real estate, Blum told Pitcairn Properties in June that he would take over the majority of the company's board, which, he argued, his group's investment agreement allowed.

Pitcairn Properties sued to block him in July, accusing him of conduct that was "self-interested" and "riddled with conflicts of interest" and that, left unchecked, would unfairly wipe out common stockholders and force the liquidation of $800 million in real estate at the worst possible time economically.

Blum is on the Pitcairn Properties board as a representative of investors who were clients of Bekkedam. They bought $50 million in preferred stock in Pitcairn Properties in June 2004. Blum has countered in court documents that his attempt to take control of Pitcairn's board was justified by contract.

1 | 2 | 3 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|