The Dark Arts
of Mathematical Deception
By Charles Seife
Viking. 295 pp. $25.95
Reviewed by Fred Bortz
How did O.J. Simpson earn an acquittal in his famous murder trial? One reason, Charles Seife writes in his new book, Proofiness: The Dark Arts of Mathematical Deception, was a "transparently fallacious" but nonetheless successful defense argument that it was "incredibly improbable that Simpson murdered his ex-wife."
Seife describes the lawyer's line of reasoning like this: "[Only] one in a thousand wife-beaters winds up murdering his spouse. One in a thousand! Such a small probability means that O.J. Simpson almost certainly isn't the murderer, right?"
The proper statistic to consider is the percentage of murdered abused women whose killer was also their abuser - 50 to 80 percent. But the defense team had successfully used a technique that Seife calls "risk mismanagement," putting valid data in the wrong context. It was "tantamount to turning Simpson's wife-beating . . . into exculpatory evidence," and it gave a sympathetic jury a way to dismiss Simpson's past violence.