Race is such a tricky, hot-button thing, so many of us just try to pretend it isn't a part of the issues we deal with, even when it obviously is. The Eagles' locker room shocked much of the (white) fan base by voting Vick the Ed Block Courage Award last year. Hmmm. What do you think that was about?
Another conversation last week, with a (white) agent. He was talking about going to a Super Bowl party many years ago, when Vick was near the start of his career. The party was largely African-American, and the agent remembered being surprised at how Vick's presence resonated with other famous players and guests - "It was like Michael Jordan had walked in," the agent said.
One of the reasons Roger Goodell was so interested in Vick's rehabilitation was Vick's standing in the African-American community. Pre-dogfight scandal, by 2007 much of white America might have seen Vick as a sideshow, a quarterback who never took his craft seriously enough to win anything. Black America saw an artist, an elegant, unstoppable performer. (They now see him as an elegant, unstoppable performer who has been persecuted by white people.)
This was much like the split that surrounded Allen Iverson in his prime. (A guy from the exact same background, a few neighborhoods over.)
So, here we are, with Vick starting for the Eagles, and playing well. All over the Internet, people (mostly African-American) argue that he has paid his dues and should be embraced. Other people (mostly not African-American) argue that torturing and killing dogs over a period of years isn't something you just shrug off because a guy went to prison for a while and is now playing real well.
I don't see any easy answers, an unqualified yes to one and no to the other. Obviously, I didn't grow up black in the rural South. I grew up white in the suburban South. I think I understand a little of the "cultural" argument. I never saw a dogfight, but in my family, dogs were not cuddly little foo-foo things; they lived outdoors, didn't come in the house. One neighbor had a kennel of hunting dogs, and gave us one who couldn't hunt.
Still, I found myself wanting to ask the ex-player last week, "So, after these dogfights in the park, did you watch the dogs being hanged and electrocuted? Did you think, 'Gee, that looks like fun, I'd like to kill some of those dogs myself!' Over and over and over again?"
Vick has been nothing but decent and courteous to me. I can't reconcile what he has done with the guy I talk to in the Eagles' locker room. I'm really hoping to get a better handle on that as we move forward. And as a sports reporter, I can't let my discomfort with what he did makes me discount what he does on the field; if I let that happen, I am not doing my job.
But I'll admit, I find the idea of Vick "sticking it to" his critics by playing well a really perverse, obnoxious notion. He can throw for 100 touchdowns this year, and he still did what he did, and it was still really, really, really wrong.
I got a chance to ask Eagles president Joe Banner something last night that a lot of people have been asking me, since Vick was named the starter. Is this organization OK with Michael Vick as the face of the franchise now?
"I think we're proud of that," Banner said. "You can look at it two ways, that people who do very wrong things can never, ever make up for it, or you can be selective, and recognize that someone did something very wrong, but allow them the opportunity to make amends."
Banner mentioned Vick's appearance yesterday at Imhotep Charter School, where he urged students to avoid destructive behavior.
"There's a lot of people out there that lose hope when they screw up," Banner said. "Somebody who can reclaim their life makes a powerful statement to those people, who are in very different circumstances than you or me. It doesn't erase what he did, it doesn't mean you've forgiven or forgotten what he did, but [Vick changing his life] means [dogfighting] isn't the only story."
I understood what Banner was saying. Maybe I'd be more completely sold on his viewpoint if the Vick appearances I've seen (and I was not there yesterday) seemed less by rote, if listening to Vick, I'd heard pain, anguish, the kind of shame I think I'd feel if I caused that much hurt.
From here, the only hope for any sort of large-scale resolution I can see is that Vick can somehow use the bigger spotlight to give us a better notion than he has so far of how these things could possibly have happened, and can demonstrate through his words and deeds he is really a different person now.
But I think it's going to be a bumpy ride.
For more Eagles coverage and opinion, read the Daily News' Eagles blog, Eagletarian, at www.eagletarian.com.
Follow him on Twitter at