DN Editorial: Veterans paying too high a price

WAR IS HELL. It always has been.

But for generations of soldiers who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, peace also has proven nothing short of hellish.

PTSD has been called by different names - like "shell shock" in World War I or "combat fatigue" in World War II - but it is the same, inevitable human response to the experience of combat. It doesn't matter if the war was thought to be "good" or "bad," or if its returning soldiers were hailed as heroes or spat upon or ignored.

Over generations, the military's typical response to soldiers with post-traumatic stress also has not varied - denial or, even worse, scorn for soldiers considered cowardly.

But on this Veterans Day, some of America's top military brass finally are showing signs that they recognize the magnitude of the problem. In fact, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey recently named PTSD as "the defining military issue of our era."

The occasion itself was evidence that the military is finally breaking with its tradition of hiding or downplaying the real costs of war to the men and women who fight it. Casey spoke as part of a panel that followed the screening - at the Pentagon, no less - of "Wartorn, 1861-2010," an HBO documentary that traces evidence of PTSD back 150 years to the Civil War. The screening brought together military officers, professionals who treat PTSD, and soldiers and families who must deal with combat injuries that are no less real just because they are unseen.

The statistics are disturbing - 100,000 diagnoses of PTSD since 2000. More soldiers now commit suicide in Iraq and Afghanistan than die in combat. Those figures don't include the veterans who kill themselves at multiple times the rate of other people their age.

"Nobody is really unscathed," Col. Charles Engel, of the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, tells his interviewer, actor James Gandolfini, in "Wartorn."