Rudovsky is a senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and a prominent civil liberties and civil rights attorney. Sosnov teaches at Widener Law School.
In 1991, West published their Pennsylvania Criminal Procedure: Law, Commentary and Forms. A second edition was published in 2001, and the men provided annual updates tracking changes in criminal court procedures.
But in 2008, West wanted to pay them only $2,500 each, so the two men ceased work on the addendum. Nevertheless, West published an update bearing Rudovsky and Sosnov's names on the title page.
The professors sued, contending that an inferior product - only three new cases were cited - damaged their professional reputations.
West quickly pulled the update, but not fast enough, it turned out.
In an interview Monday, Rudovsky and Sosnov's attorney, Richard L. Bazelon of Bazelon Less & Feldman, said testimony showed "what West had published . . . really was a sham," and done deliberately.
Bazelon said he expected West to appeal both the punitive award and the verdict. Along with the punitive damages, the jury Thursday awarded each man $90,000 in actual damages.
West issued a statement Monday saying "there is no basis in fact, law, or equity for this outcome."
"We intend to pursue every available avenue, including motions before the District Court to set aside the verdict, and appeals to the United States Court of Appeals," the statement said.
West's attorney, James F. Rittinger of Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke in New York City, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
The lengthy volume on criminal procedure is typically purchased by law libraries, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and law schools.
Contact staff writer Nathan Gorenstein at 215-854-2797 or email@example.com