Michael Smerconish: NO TAKERS FOR CIVILITY PLEDGE

December 23, 2010

TO: MESSERS Toomey, Casey, Brady, Fattah, Meehan, Gerlach, Fitzpatrick and Runyon. Will you agree to live by these words in 2011?

"I will be civil in my public discourse and behavior. I will be respectful of others whether or not I agree with them. I will stand against incivility when I see it."

So reads a 32-word civility pledge circulated in 2010 by Lanny Davis, a liberal lawyer and longtime Hillary Clinton confidante, and Mark DeMoss, a conservative public relations executive and author. You'd think it about as controversial as the Hippocratic Oath. Yet when Davis and DeMoss sent their pledge to all 535 members of Congress and 50 governors earlier this year, just two signed on.

Story continues below.

That Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., and Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., were the lone members of their respective bodies to endorse an oath to - gasp! - be respectful is the latest evidence of the vile state of political discourse in this country.

I'm all for the type of hard-nosed, aggressive and civil political discussion that Davis and DeMoss are hoping to promote. And I applauded the dozens of former elected officials who sent a letter to literally every congressional candidate throughout the country this year, imploring them to remain open to compromise should they earn a trip to Washington.

I just think these sort of efforts need to expand the Rolodex, or Internet address book. They should have been signed, sealed and delivered to talk-radio hosts and cable-television pundits, too. Elected officials may be the only agents of intolerance directly accountable to the people. But they do not represent the root of this country's incivility problem.

Rather, the vicious cycle begins with the 24/7 media beast that boils every issue down to a liberal-conservative, left-right, red-state-blue-state shout-fest and plants it on a split screen. At some point, listeners and viewers became conditioned to view politics only through one or the other of those diametrically opposed worldviews. Anything in between - moderation, pragmatism, whatever you want to call it - is now seen as the domain of the weak-kneed.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|