Second, whatever Corbett offers should be taken seriously.
This is different. Budgets that Ed Rendell proposed were just one step toward a final product. Corbett's proposal will be, essentially, what will be.
Even if lawmakers tinker with specific line items, "I think you'll see the spend-number stay the same," says House Appropriations Committee boss Rep. Bill Adolph, R-Delco.
I think he's right.
And that "spend-number" is expected to be about $27 billion, or $1 billion less than last year's figure.
Don't count on arguments. Corbett's party controls the process. There's no money to fight over. And, since there's no good news, lawmakers will want to make this more "Corbett's budget" than their own.
After eight straight late budgets, they'll pass this one early and get out of town to avoid wading through daily protests.
Third, balancing a reduced spending plan with a projected deficit of $3 billion to $4 billion without raising taxes means broader, deeper cuts than Pennsylvania's seen, possibly ever.
Unlike the feds, the state by law must balance its budget. Whatever the deficit is must be covered by cuts or revenue. Corbett's no-new-taxes/no-new-fees pledge takes revenue off the table, leaving only cuts.
"People are prepared for it and now's the time to do it," says Senate Appropriations Committee chairman Jake Corman, R-Centre County.
He says he has no details despite two meetings with the governor at the mansion: "He's a prosecutor. Information goes in, not much comes out." But Corman expects no fiscal tricks and no surprises, just cuts.
As such, education, welfare and health services will take big hits because they have big pots of money.
That's bad news for Philly, something Mayor Nutter briefly acknowledged in his budget address Thursday. Expected state (and federal) cuts, said Nutter, carry the potential for a "devastating impact" on the city.