In particular, the proposed changes say that for existing sites that are being renovated or expanded within their current boundaries, if public access is not currently granted to the site, it does not need to be granted in the future. Current regulations impose a responsibility to grant public access, usually through walkways, or to contribute to funding public access projects nearby.
"The waterfront belongs to the people. The people have a right to use the waterfront," said Debbie Mans, executive director of the NY/NJ Baykeeper environmental group.
In Newark alone, she said, current rules have resulted in the contribution of $210,000 by waterfront businesses toward construction of a riverfront park.
That river was never part of the landscape for many city residents, said Johnston, an official with the Ironbound Community Corp.
"Many of us who grew up in Newark didn't know there was a river here," she said. City residents "have to find their recreation within the city. They don't have the resources to drive to the 127 miles of beaches."
Under the public trust doctrine, a legal concept adopted by New Jersey that dates to the Roman emperor Justinian, the public has the right to swim in coastal waters and walk along their shores. Courts have held that the public has the right to walk or sit on the sand up to the mean high water mark
Ray Cantor, a consultant working with state environmental protection commissioner Robert Martin, said the only significant change affecting urban areas under the proposed new rules is the lack of a public access requirement for renovations or expansions of existing industrial or port projects in which there has not been public access in the past.
"If that's 'weakening things,' then I'll accept that," he said.