Inquirer Editorial: PACs' loophole

Posted: April 13, 2011

City officials need to get rid of a loophole in Philadelphia's campaign-finance law that lets deep-pocketed donors skirt contribution limits.

This legal end run nullifies the city's rules that prohibit a political-action committee from giving more than $10,600 to any individual candidate each year.

The campaign-giving limits, which Mayor Nutter supported as a City Council member, are designed to minimize the potential impact on city policy by any one donor or political committee.

But the loophole permits political committees backing a particular candidate to spread funds around to other committees, which then each donate the maximum to the same candidate.

The net effect is that one well-financed political committee can direct more of its funds toward a favored candidate. Even though the campaign-finance law bars this practice by wealthy individual donors, it left the loophole open for political committees.

The Daily News last week reported that the political-action committee of the local electricians' union has used the tactic to aid incumbent City Councilman Bill Green and former district attorney candidate Daniel McCaffery.

Voters shouldn't have to follow a complex money trail to find out who is really bankrolling a particular candidate. Beyond that, voters deserve solid assurance that no one group of donors holds too much sway with a candidate.

The obvious solution is to close the loophole, as proposed by a pending Council bill, which the mayor supports. Since this is Council's second stab at the issue, the legislation should leave no doubt that PACs are also banned from wheeling funds.

comments powered by Disqus
|
|
|
|
|