Harry Gross: An alternative to a reverse mortgage?

Posted: June 24, 2011

Dear Harry: I've gotten myself into a bind. We bought our home in 2006, and the monthly payments of $1,344 were a breeze because we were both working at good salaries in pretty secure jobs.

My wife lost her job in January, and I was pretty much forced to retire when I hit 65. SS and our pensions are just not enough for us to get along. We are using savings to make up for our monthly deficit. If we could cut our mortgage payments in half, we'd be OK. However, no bank could offer us any kind of deal that will do it. A guy approached my wife recently advising us to get a reverse mortgage that will not only pay off the current balance of $194,000 but give us about $500 a month. The kicker is that he estimated the total up-front fees to be more than $15,000, which he said could probably be incorporated into the reverse mortgage. The house is worth about $375,000. How does this sound? And don't tell us to move to a less expensive home. We LOVE living here!

What Harry says: Those up-front fees for reverse mortgages are often a deal killer. I'd like you to consider a long-shot. Contact your lender and ask if they can convert your existing mortgage to a reverse mortgage with the interest on the existing balance as a substitute for payments to you.

As a result, you'd not have to pay that $1,344 and you'd get no additional money. I admit that this is a long-shot, but it's worth a try. If that fails, try to get two other quotes on a reverse mortgage.

Write Harry Gross c/o the Daily News, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130. Harry urges all his readers to give blood - contact the American Red Cross at 800-Red Cross.

|
|
|
|
|