Government intervention not needed on natural gas

The private sector is doing just fine. Proposed legislation would be a costly handout.

June 26, 2011
  • A Peco truck pulls away from the company's Plymouth Meeting service center after fueling with compressed natural gas. In Philadelphia, compressed natural gas sells for the equivalent of about $2 per gallon of gasoline.

Tim Chapman

is chief operating officer of Heritage Action for America (heritageaction.com), a conservative grassroots advocacy group based in Washington

Ford Motor Co. is on to something. This year, hundreds of taxis, powered by compressed natural gas, will pop up around the country: 120 Ford Transit Connects in the Los Angeles area, 70 in Connecticut. Las Vegas, St. Louis, and Philadelphia will also see their own fleet of Transit Connects soon.

America's abundant supply of cheap, accessible natural gas and the stubbornly high cost of gasoline and diesel are making natural gas vehicles more attractive and economical. This is how the free-market economy is supposed to work. With more than 111,000 natural gas vehicles on U.S. roads and more than 12 million worldwide, it is clear a market is evolving.

Story continues below.

Unfortunately, whenever the private sector is on to something good, meddlesome politicians and special interests are not far behind.

The vehicle for the latest meddling is the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act. More than 180 representatives - Republicans and Democrats - have signed on.

Unfortunately, the NAT GAS Act would not give Americans a new solution for alternative transportation; rather, it would simply give a handout to those who are already producing and using natural gas vehicles.

Manufacturers would receive a $4,000 tax credit for every natural gas vehicle produced, and consumers would receive $7,500 for the purchase of a light-duty car and $64,000 for a heavy-duty truck. Businesses could get $100,000 for installation of a commercial fueling station, and fuel would be subsidized at the rate of 50 cents per gallon. Over five years, it adds up to between $5 billion and $9 billion.

One of the leading backers of the legislation is billionaire T. Boone Pickens, who has substantial interests in the natural gas industry. He recently toured West Chester University's natural gas fueling facility with two Southeast Pennsylvania Republican congressmen, Patrick Meehan and Jim Gerlach, both NAT GAS Act supporters.

The showcase tour was ripe with irony. Somehow, the university managed to acquire more than 20 vehicles that run on natural gas and two filling stations without these market-distorting subsidies.

Why would a university have made such an investment without the NAT GAS Act's federal handout? Pickens' trademark candor gives us the answer: "The fuel is so much cheaper. It'll pay for whatever the conversion [to natural gas] cost is."

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|