He goes on to cite one recent poll that found 39 percent of Americans now believe the recession-battered economy is in "a long-term permanent decline" from which it "will never fully recover," and another survey that reported 57 percent of those questioned believe their children never will achieve the same standard of living they've enjoyed.
Cities in a slump
Pollster and political consultant Frank Luntz - a regular these days on Fox News - told the Telegraph that Americans don't hold Obama solely responsible for the nation's gloom. "Every institution in America has gone through a collapse," he said. "The church is not what it was. ... The media is much less trusted today. ... Big business does not have credibility."
One of the leading causes of this generalized collapse of confidence was noted in the Irish Times, the voice of that nation's establishment. Columnist and critic Fintan O'Toole, who visited the United States recently, wrote of being struck by the breadth and depth of the damage the recession has done to the most vital engine of the nation's economy: its great urban areas.
"On their own, big U.S. cities make up some of the world's largest economies. If they were countries, New York would rank 13th in the world, Los Angeles 18th and Chicago 21st. Even Washington, D.C., has an economy larger than Norway's, Austria's or South Africa's. Ireland's GDP is about the same as that of Minneapolis or Detroit."
O'Toole's statistics come from a report prepared earlier this year for the U.S. Conference of Mayors, which came and went with far too little attention paid to its sobering portrait of the urban economy.
"These cities aren't just crucial to the American economy," O'Toole wrote. "They are the engines of globalization. They soak up immigrants and exports from every continent. The capital they generate fuels investment around the world, including, of course, Ireland. If they're in trouble, then so is the whole model of economic globalization. And they are in trouble."
As the mayors' report pointed out, continuing unemployment - the so-called jobless recovery - is the root of that trouble. Since the crisis began in 2007, for example, New York has lost 385,200 jobs, Detroit 323,400. More than 330 metropolitan areas now have unemployment rates of more than 6 percent.
The Los Angeles region lost 537,100 jobs during the recession, and according to the mayors' report, it probably won't get them back until 2018. "It is striking, it's sobering, and it's a call to action," Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, the Conference of Mayors president, told the New York Times.
In fact, O'Toole wrote, "Of the 25 metropolitan areas with the highest unemployment, 13 are in California and seven are in the 'sunshine states' of Florida, Nevada, and Arizona. There are Californian cities ... with unemployment rates even higher than Ireland's."
The consequences of this lingering joblessness are amplified by the pervasive insecurity of those who are working - uncertainty about further job cuts and anxiety about the future, which growing numbers will face with little but underfunded 401(k)s and increasingly threatened Social Security and Medicare guarantees. Moreover, the decade just past was even worse for real private-sector income growth than the 10 years following the onset of the Depression.
Unemployment and reviving the nation's urban economies ought to be the defining issues of the coming presidential campaign. They probably won't be. In that case, Luntz's prediction to the Telegraph that 2012 will be a "none-of-the-above election" easily could be true - and that's an unsettling prospect.
Timothy Rutten is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.