Eagles not likely to go overboard on free agents

July 17, 2011|By Jonathan Tamari, Inquirer Staff Writer
  • The new labor deal may make it riskier for teams to give out big contracts to the likes of Nnamdi Asomugha, above.

Whenever free agency starts, we know the Eagles have big plans. Joe Banner said it back in February. Andy Reid said it. Howie Roseman and Jeffrey Lurie have said it.

After all that saying, fans will expect some delivering once the NFL lockout is settled and free agency and trades really begin. With a labor deal appearing on the horizon, a frenzy of activity is soon expected across the league, and the Eagles believe they'll be in position to take advantage of the compressed 2011 signing period.

Team officials think they have the manpower to negotiate deals on several fronts, with Banner, Roseman, and in-house counsel Aileen Daly all experienced in handling contract talks.

Story continues below.

The Eagles will have roughly $16 million to $18 million in salary-cap space once they account for rookie charges and other deductions, a league source said. That would put them around the middle of the pack compared with rest of the league, according to the source. Still, it should be enough for some significant signings.

It's enough to send the sports-talk world reeling with possibilities. Nnamdi Asomugha! Albert Haynesworth! Reggie Bush!

But don't expect a fantasy football-style parade of big names strolling through the NovaCare Complex. For one thing, the new labor deal will slow the growth of the salary cap, making big, superstar contracts tougher to manage.

More important, multiple people within the Eagles have stressed that while they intend to make bold moves, the team still believes in building primarily through the draft, and then adding a few key free agency strikes to supplement their homegrown talent.

The Eagles will certainly add players - they know they have a hole to fill at cornerback, among other needs - and the team has shown a willingness to make bold acquisitions. But they will attempt do so while leaving room to re-sign current players and not relying too heavily on new faces.

It's a quieter and more subtle approach, but one that the team has long followed - as have many of the most successful teams in the NFL, including both of last year's Super Bowl participants.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|