Chemosurgery goes directly to tumor.

Trying a more focused way to attack a rare eye cancer

July 24, 2011|By Marie McCullough, Inquirer Staff Writer
Image 1 of 5
  • After his procedure, above, Tyler Sanzone is in the recovery room with his parents, Emily and Mike, of Old Bridge, N.J., and neurosurgeon Pascal Jabbour. At right, Tyler is prepared for the chemosurgery procedure.
  • After his procedure, above, Tyler Sanzone is in the recovery room with his parents, Emily and Mike, of Old Bridge, N.J., and neurosurgeon Pascal Jabbour. At right, Tyler is prepared for the chemosurgery procedure. (APRIL SAUL / Staff Photographer )
  • Logan Milleman, now 4, had the procedure in Philadelphia two years ago.It worked, and now Logan, of Kechi, Kan., strengthens that eye by wearing a patch on his healthy eye for a few hours a day - his "pirate time." (Milleman family photo )
  • Carol L. Shields uses ultrasound to see how much Tyler's tumor has shrunk. A specialist at Wills Eye Institute and Thomas Jefferson University, she has called for careful study of chemosurgery. (MARIE McCULLOUGH / Staff )
  • Tyler Sanzone, here at 5 months, has a rare cancer in his right eye. A tiny artery was the pathway to it in a method tried by Wills Eye Institute and Thomas Jefferson University. (APRIL SAUL / Staff Photographer )
  • Tyler Sanzone in June, a few months after the chemosurgery, with a slight eyelid droop that is likely to go away. He could perceive light with his right eye, although the retina had not reattached. And his left eye remained fine. (Sanzone family photo )

Emily Sanzone watched her son in his bouncy seat. As Tyler looked toward the ceiling light, there it was again, a whiteness in his right pupil, like a cataract. He looked down, and it disappeared.

It's probably nothing, Emily and her husband, Mike, agreed. The Old Bridge, N.J., couple marveled that their thriving 4-month-old was already wearing clothes for a 9-month-old. Even so, when Emily took Tyler for a routine pediatrician visit, she mentioned the whiteness.

That casual observation would transform her infant into a cancer patient, research subject, and pint-size pioneer in ocular oncology.

Tyler's right eye appeared white because light was reflecting off a tumor. It was growing in his retina, the sensitive membrane at the back of the eye that converts light rays into signals the brain interprets as images.

Story continues below.

In early March, he became one of about 300 children diagnosed annually in the United States with a malignancy called retinoblastoma, or RB.

The tumor, tests showed, was the size of a grape, nearly filling Tyler's eyeball. It had forced the retina to peel away from its nourishing support tissue, leaving the eye blind. Untreated, such tumors typically invade the optic nerve and then, with ferocious lethality, the brain.

Fortunately, Tyler's cancer was still confined to the globe, and his left eye was fine. Removing the diseased eye would give him a 98 percent chance of survival, explained ocular oncologist Carol L. Shields, a renowned retinoblastoma expert at Wills Eye Institute and Thomas Jefferson University.

Not many years ago, the discussion would have ended there. Standard therapies - eye radiation or whole-body intravenous chemotherapy - could not save such a "hopeless eye."

But in March, Shields laid out a novel option: squirting chemotherapy directly into the eye through the tiny ophthalmic artery, the only vessel that feeds into the organ. It might save the eyeball so Tyler wouldn't need a prosthesis. It might even restore some vision.

Shields stressed that there were risks. Maneuvering a catheter through the baby's vessels could cause a stroke, hemorrhage, loss of a limb, even death. The chemo might scar the artery, foiling repeated catheterizations. And if three infusions, one a month, didn't kill the cancer, it would all be for nothing.

Tyler's eye would then have to be enucleated. Removed.

 

Evolving treatment

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|