Worldview: War on terrorism a phantom

September 11, 2011|By Trudy Rubin, Inquirer Columnist

Did we win the war on terrorism?

Ten years after 9/11, Osama bin Laden is dead, and al-Qaeda is fractured. There's been no second attack (although intelligence chatter has picked up possible threats during anniversary commemorations).

So people ask: Did we win?

Not really. What we've won is hard knowledge that cost us dearly. And what we've lost - well, that will cost us even more.

Story continues below.

We know now (and many knew at the start) that there never was a "war on terrorism." The Bush administration used that term to rally the country at a terrible time, but it was badly misleading. It misdiagnosed the nature of the struggle.

This was not a conventional war like World War II where victory could be won by bullets. At the broader level, it was a battle of ideas that would take decades to play out. At the narrow level, it should have been a very specific effort to crush the jihadi network that had attacked us - al-Qaeda.

Yet in 2001, we were accustomed to fighting states and didn't know how to confront an enemy that was stateless.

And so we went to war against states.

Let me be clear. I believe we had no choice but to declare war on the Afghan Taliban that was host to bin Laden. However, we were smart enough, initially, to rely on local Afghan ground forces to do the fighting, helped by our air strikes and commandos.

After that, the Bush administration's grandiose approach to war against terrorism did us in.

Instead of cleaning up the al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Bush rushed to war in Iraq - which had no al-Qaeda. Our shift in focus permitted al-Qaeda to flourish in Pakistan and ignored the return of Taliban networks to Afghanistan.

Meantime, the gross mishandling of postwar Iraq helped create an al-Qaeda monster in that country, where there hadn't been one. It also inspired jihadis elsewhere.

And here's the biggest irony: We invaded Iraq because the Bush team convinced itself, despite much evidence to the contrary, that Iraq was home to al-Qaeda - along with a nuclear program. Yet it was wealthy Saudis who financed al-Qaeda and other jihadis. And, after 2001, nuclear-armed Pakistan became home base for al-Qaeda and its allies. But we didn't sufficiently confront these two allies, focusing instead on Iraq.

Gradually we learned these bitter lessons over the last decade, at a huge cost in lost U.S., Iraqi, and Afghan lives.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|