Not the time for the Phillies to play it safe

THE PHILLIES have one pivotal decision, just one, that must be made before they buckle down and address the nitty-gritty details of picking up the pieces from their shattered dream and trying to put them back together again. If they get it wrong, nothing that follows will really matter.

They have to take a clear-eyed, hard-boiled look at where they are at this point in franchise history.

The easy conclusion would be to write off their premature postseason expiration date as a simple combination of too many unfortunate injuries and poor timing for the offense to go ice cold. To preserve as much of the core of the group that has won five straight division titles as possible and try, try again in 2012. Business as usual.

There is some historical precedent to support that approach, too. Most hardball historians agree, for example, that the 1977 and '78 Phillies that didn't make it to the World Series were actually more talented than the 1980 edition that won it all.

That would be safe. That would be comfortable.

And that would be a mistake.

Oh, sure, they should be one of the better teams in the National League next year. As long as Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee and Cole Hamels are healthy, they can compete and might well win the division once again. Clearly, though, that's not good enough anymore. Not after taking a baby step backward in each of the last three postseasons even as expectations were rocketing skyward.

After the Phillies beat Los Angeles in the 2008 NLCS, a high-ranking Dodgers official tipped his cap to the winners' intangibles. "They were just tougher than we were," he said.

Remember when the Phillies were that team? When it didn't matter if they fell behind early or trailed late because there was always a sense that they'd do whatever it would take to win? And so often did?

Even though they won a club-record 102 games this season, that sense has been missing for a while now.

In the book, "Moneyball," Oakland general manager Billy Beane's No. 1 rule is defined, in part, as follows: "No matter how successful you are, change is always good. There can never be a status quo."

The Phillies have adhered to that, sort of. They've made changes every season since winning the second world championship in franchise history in 2008. The turnover that followed has been significant. But they've done it mostly by signing or trading for older, established players. The nucleus - their status quo, if you will - has remained virtually untouched.