Worldview: Tunisian elections a key test of democracy

October 23, 2011|By Trudy Rubin, Inquirer Columnist
  • Tunisians women read election wall posters in Tunis on Saturday.

TUNIS, Tunisia - Today's election in Tunisia will affect the Middle East more than the grisly death of Libya's Moammar Gadhafi.

Tunisia and Libya provide opposing models of how an Arab revolution can play out. Gadhafi was ousted by civil war and died by the gun, a pattern that Syria and Yemen seem doomed to follow.

But small, middle-class Tunisia made a peaceful revolution that inspired the rest of the region. Now its elections - the first of the Arab Spring - may provide crucial answers to two linked questions:

Can any Arab country successfully transit from despotism to democracy? And can any Arab country find a formula by which Islam and democracy can coexist?

Story continues below.

Both questions were in play in Tunis on the campaign's last day, as chic women distributed fliers for the leftist Democratic Pole movement on Tunis' leafy main boulevard, and caravans of honking cars carted supporters of the Islamist Al-Nahda party to a final rally.

At the outdoor rally grounds, the impressive organizational skills of Al-Nahda were on display, as lines of young men in T-shirts emblazoned with their party's logo shepherded thousands of supporters to plastic chairs (separate sections for men and women). Veiled women handed out packets of information in English and French to the foreign press, and others staffed an Islamic bookstall at the entrance.

Al-Nahda, which was banned under the previous regime and which conducted violent attacks in the 1990s, quickly rebuilt itself, drawing manpower and donations from thousands who were imprisoned in past decades. Its leaders, including founder and longtime exile Rashid Ghannouchi (whom I will interview for my next column), insist they now want to play by democratic rules. They say they won't change the liberal Tunisian family-status law that protects women's rights.

But many in Tunisia's secular, educated middle class, especially women, distrust those promises. They accuse Al-Nahda of "double discourse," especially Ghannouchi. They say he talks moderately about democracy to a Western audience, while, for example, he called for a caliphate when speaking in Cairo. Al-Nahda leaders insist they don't want a religious state, but at the rally I attended, one candidate told the crowd, "Sharia should be the reference for all laws."

So the proof of the Islamists' intentions will only come after elections.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|