Cain initially denied any settlement was paid. He later said in regard to one case that "there was some sort of settlement or termination," but that the amount wasn't large. His murky memory hurts him. Clarity is essential for presidential candidates.
Of course, even if Cain recounts to the minutest detail his version of what led to the harassment allegations, it won't change the minds of some people. Twenty years later, there are those who believe Thomas harassed Hill, and those who don't.
People will debate whether an ambitious executive like Cain would jeopardize his business career by harassing women. Surely, when he was a manager at Coca-Cola, Pillsbury, Burger King, and Godfather's Pizza, where he was CEO, he was at some point taught proper workplace behavior.
Cain told a PBS reporter that one of his acccusers must have thought he was "too close for comfort" when he stood near her and said, "You're the same height of my wife," who is 5 feet tall and "comes up to my chin."
Sounds innocent enough, but innocence is in the eye of the beholder. An anonymous source told the Times that Cain's other accuser had made more than one claim about his behavior.
Cain's candidacy may weather these vague allegations from the past. His defenders say the charges amount to a "high-tech lynching," the same words Thomas used when Hill's accusations almost derailed his nomination to become the Supreme Court's second African American justice.
Thomas' reference to the long list of black men unjustifiably accused of raping white women and lynched after the Civil War and into the 20th century helped turn public opinion in his favor.
Thomas never faced an official complaint or lawsuit by Hill, but there should be records in Cain's settlements of what each person said transpired.
Cain may not want to share that information, but at least one of his accusers does - and that's the best way to clear the air and move on.