If the gambling referendum passes, it will be the first of several legal hurdles that the Garden State must overcome to offer what Nevada has had exclusively since 1975.
Early indicators suggest the support is there. Results of a Rutgers-Eagleton poll released Oct. 19 showed a majority of likely voters (58 percent) approved sports betting.
Supporters say it will lift Atlantic City from its downward spiral by attracting weekend crowds to the Shore resort beyond the peak summer season. They envision packed casinos during Super Bowl weekend and the NCAA basketball tournament.
But opponents say sports betting will not save Atlantic City because it generates too little revenue; it is less than 2 percent of total casino revenue in Nevada. And some contend that sports betting was particularly addictive because of its fast-paced action.
Lawmakers - including Sen. Jim Whelan (D., Atlantic), who's facing a tough reelection battle against Assemblyman Vincent Polistina (R., Atlantic) - say they are ready to pass a bill to legalize sports wagering. Gov. Christie said he would support such legislation if Tuesday's referendum question passes.
But gambling legal experts cautioned that it could take months, even years, for the process to play out in court.
The main sticking point for New Jersey and other states is the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, of 1992. The law prohibits sports betting in all but four states - Nevada, Oregon, Montana, and Delaware - and of those, only Nevada has a true sports book. Delaware offers parlay bets on NFL games where at least three bets must be right to win the wager.
New Jersey missed out on its chance to legalize sports betting when it failed to meet a deadline for grandfathering it in 1993. A bill never made it out of committee.