The American Debate: Even politics is not utterly thankless

November 24, 2011|By Dick Polman, For The Inquirer
  • Newt Gingrich, GOP presidential candidate, highly paid historian.

As we ingest and imbibe this Thanksgiving Day, let's remember all that we have to be thankful for. Even in the realm of politics:

I'm thankful for NBC's "Celebrity Apprentice" because it pulled Donald Trump from the political arena, sparing us more coverage of his faux candidacy and rhetorical toxicity.

I'm thankful for Ronald Reagan, who could teach today's conservatives about responsible governance. He raised taxes at least 11 times when it was necessary, and unlike the 2011 congressional Republicans, he said that fixing our decaying roads with public money was important, warning that "the bridges and highways we fail to repair today will have to be rebuilt tomorrow at many times the cost."

Story continues below.

I'm thankful for Newt Gingrich, who has inspired struggling historians everywhere with his claim that the mortgage giant Freddie Mac paid him upward of $1.8 million - not to lobby his Republican pals, but merely to offer his advice "as a historian." If a former nontenured professor from West Georgia College can rake in that kind of money with history lessons, imagine how much a top prof could make from writing a history of oil drilling for BP.

Speaking of historians, I'm thankful they have reminded us that Paul Revere's job was to warn the colonists that the British were coming (as opposed to Sarah Palin's claim that Revere's job was to warn the British), and they reminded us that the opening shots of the American Revolution were fired at Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts (as opposed to Michele Bachmann's twice-uttered claim that the shots were fired in New Hampshire).

I'm thankful for Twitter, because it's the speediest and most efficient way to confirm whether a congressman like Anthony Weiner is fulfilling his desire to go the full monty.

I'm thankful for the Ron Paul fans who relentlessly entertain me with e-mails about Paul's alleged viability as a presidential candidate - without once considering that it might be tough to elect a guy who seeks to eradicate federal disaster aid when we're still recovering from the year's floods and tornadoes and in an era when abnormal weather is the norm. In Paul's words, "We should be like 1900" - and here I thought elections were supposed to be about the future.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|