Karen Heller: No debate: GOP show is tops

Another week, another GOP debate. Know how many we've had? Eleven or 14, depending on how you count. Know how many more are scheduled? Thirteen! I am sometimes prone to exaggerate, friends, but here I do not.

Actually, there is plenty to commend the GOP debates. They prove to be far more illuminating than Andy Reid's postgame news conferences, which make one think of lost Beckett one-acts in their thorough yet monosyllabic exploration of futility.

GOP debates prove perfect for our queasy economic times in that they cost almost nothing. They provide ample job opportunities not only for underemployed one-percenters and the political punditariat, saving journalism from the shoals of despair, but also for the guy who drives those zippy lecterns around from one state to the next.

And debates are ratings winners, finally providing CNN with regularly scheduled programming that doesn't induce narcolepsy. The Oct. 18 Las Vegas gathering - aka "Romney touches Perry" - drew 5.6 million viewers, huge for cable, more than that night's Biggest Loser.

True, many viewers tune in for the gaffes and the pure entertainment value, the Nov. 9 debate in Michigan being the one to beat, when Rick Perry, who looks like a superhero in street clothing, suggested eliminating three cabinet departments - Commerce, Education, and TBA. Myself, I've expended considerable energy trying to figure out whom Ron Paul most resembles, Walter Brennan or the Muppets' Statler and Waldorf.

Also, why Santorum?

There's the joy of listening to "The Voice," Herman Cain. What a wonderful country this is that a man with a gorgeous, hypnotic baritone, prone to bromides and not a solitary plausible policy solution, believes he has a chance to be leader not merely of a pizza chain but also of the free world.

Tuesday's debate on national security, staged at an all-white enclave of Washington, provided true substantive differences, as well as the ghosts of Republican administrations past. (Ed Meese! Paul Wolfowitz!) The debate demonstrated that the GOP can enlarge its tent from its earlier, tea party tendencies, and welcome some political diversity, not just fearmongering and callous indifference.