Closing the divide over drilling

December 09, 2011|By Jodi Liss and Mike Uretsky
  • Protesters rallied in Trenton last month to oppose drilling for natural gas in the Delaware River watershed.

Aren't you sick of the gridlock? The refusal to compromise, the unwillingness to listen to the other side, the take-no-prisoners vituperation?

No, not Washington - Pennsylvania.

Natural-gas drilling is an issue on which communities should and could find common ground. But the angry tone of the debate is only driving us apart.

The polarization is only partly about the risk of environmental damage. In the county where we live, for example, drilling has brought long-simmering social tensions to the surface.

After decades of seeing few newcomers, Wayne County has experienced an influx of transplants from more urban areas such as Philadelphia and New Jersey, many seeking a quieter life or at least quieter weekends. There is unspoken tension between the county's rural culture and the urban one of the new arrivals.

Story continues below.

You can spot the differences around town. City people drive different cars, eat at different restaurants, and wear different clothes. Many don't socialize extensively with the farming families that have been in the area for generations. Many are more affluent and educated. And too many assume they are smarter or more knowledgeable than the longtime residents - even about the land and environment with which they're relatively unfamiliar.

While gas companies that have shortchanged landowners or cut environmental corners deserve criticism, too many anti-drilling newcomers also demonize longtime residents who are open to responsible drilling. Often, those protesting loudest do not have much at stake but want to make decisions for those who do.

We might be able to deal with drilling more intelligently if clear, unbiased scientific information were available and accessible to the public. But few will wade through the 80-plus pages of the Delaware River Basin Commission's draft regulations or the hundreds of pages of New York's draft environmental impact statement. Instead, they rely on received "wisdom" from those with vested interests.

Pertinent questions are going unanswered: How do we prevent gas from contaminating aquifers? Can we safely recycle wastewater? Could a spill affect Philadelphia's water supply?

In the absence of solid information, hyperbole is crowding out reality. While Penn State's Marcellus Shale website is a good first step, it is limited. We are largely left to wonder.

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|