Your Money: A peek at what 2012 may bring for investors

January 10, 2012|By Erin E. Arvedlund, Inquirer Columnist
  • In this Jan. 3, 2012 file photo, Robert Tuccillo, Jr., a Barclays Capital trader, is surrounded with stock market information monitors as he works at the New York Stock Market. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews, File)

Investors refer to 2000 to 2010 as the Lost Decade, because the S&P 500 offered barely any return to those who had their money in the market index. Sadly, 2011 continued that trend.

The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index was essentially flat last year. Officially, it lost 0.0028 percent. On a total-return basis, where dividends are included, the index was up 2.1 percent, according to MarketWatch data. One U.S. stock exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the index, the SPDR S&P 500 (SPY), gained 1.2 percent for the year, and other index funds performed similarly if you include dividends.

Yet 2011 felt like a roller coaster because the index traced a path of about 3,000 points - up and down - during the year. Could 2012 finally be better?

Story continues below.

Expect more volatility, which could extend not just to stocks but also bonds and precious metals such as gold, says Fidelity Global Strategies Fund (FDYSX) manager Jurrien Timmer.

Gold can behave like a risk asset one day and a safety asset the next, Timmer said. "Think of it as a 'golden triangle,' with gold in one corner, Treasuries in another, and stocks in the third.

"It is hard enough to figure out where the markets are going, let alone what correlations are going to do," he said. "My conviction remains high that over the long term, gold can be a better store of value than government bonds or cash, but over the near term, the asset class can get caught up in the liquidity vise the same way emerging markets do."

Even bond king Bill Gross, head of PIMCO, the world's largest bond-fund manager, missed out on the tremendous Treasury bond rally last year, insisting that emerging-market bonds were the better choice. He was wrong, and trailed his peers.

Still, he said, he expects more of the same volatility in 2012. In a recent note to clients, Gross wrote he expects the January Federal Reserve meeting to "give assurances via language that the cost of money will remain constant at 25 basis points [0.25 percent] for three years or more - until inflation or unemployment reach specific target levels. If and when that doesn't work," another round of government money-printing, or QE3, could come by midyear, he estimated.

"The financial markets are slowly imploding - delevering - because there's too much paper and too little trust," he wrote. "Goodbye 'old normal'; stand by to redefine 'new normal,' and welcome to 2012's 'paranormal.' "

1 | 2 | Next »
|
|
|
|
|