He responded that he would appreciate it if I never told anybody, especially his wife, that we'd dated . . . ever! He elaborated that he doesn't want her to know the type of guy he used to be, which to me means I was "that type of girl," which isn't true. She was part of this circle and was herself dating somebody else.
Our reunion is coming up. His messages keep getting more insistent that I do not acknowledge them at the reunion. While I have no intention of bringing up the past, I do resent being told I must lie. Any ideas?
Answer: I suspect that, 10 years ago, he was seeing both of you at the same time, though that's hardly the only reason he or she might see you as a threat.
But I don't have to guess or suspect, and you don't have to worry there's something more complicated going on. That's because the only thing that matters is what you believe is the right thing to do.
You don't feel it's right to cover for him, so don't, and reply to his latest message with those intentions: "I won't put 'Roger's Ex' on my nametag, but I won't lie, either, if somebody else brings it up."
I hope he takes your polite refusal as a cue to bring more honesty to his marriage, but hope is as far as I'll go; that part of the problem is neither mine nor yours to solve.
E-mail Carolyn Hax at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax, or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.