In a letter he sent to Thomas E. Knudsen, the district's new chief recovery officer, he wrote: "Unless the School District management can provide compelling evidence to alleviate this doubt, our Independent Auditor's Report will include an explanatory paragraph to reflect our conclusion of substantial doubt [about the district's ability] to continue as a going concern."
And if the district cannot explain by Friday how it will make up a projected deficit this fiscal year, Butkovitz said, he would include a warning in the district's annual financial report that could hamper the district's ability to borrow money and sell bonds.
The Independent Auditor's Report, prepared by his office, is included in the district's comprehensive financial report sent each year to bond-rating agencies and bondholders. The target date for the report is Feb. 10.
Butkovitz said that the last time a controller had made a formal finding that questioned the financial viability of a government entity was in the early 1990s, when then-Controller Jonathan Saidel issued a warning about the city's finances.
The financial tumult, Butkovitz said, led to structural changes in city government and the creation of the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperative Authority (PICA) board that has oversight over city finances.
Butkovitz said his letter to Knudsen was a warning to give the district the chance to avoid having the negative information included in its annual report.
In a statement released in response to the Butkovitz letter, the district said management would address each of the controller's concerns.
"It is important to note that there has been no finding that the district cannot continue as a 'going concern,' " the statement said. "The district continues to meet both its debt service obligations and payroll.
