A petition filed in November by the association, and pending before the FCC, alleges that the bill violates a 1996 over-the-air reception-device rule that blocks restrictions of satellite-dish installations without a public-safety concern or historic-preservation justification.
"We feel that it isn't just a matter of taste, but a matter of fairness," said Lisa McCabe, the association's director of public policy and outreach. "It's a burden. It would increase the costs of doing business in the city and would ultimately fall on the users."
The city's two major dish companies, DirecTV and Dish Network, argue that the city uses "aesthetic concerns as a pretext to restrict consumers' access to satellite television."
But the city disagrees.
"There's no consideration," said William Carter, Clarke's director of legislative affairs. "We simply ask that they don't do in our community what they wouldn't do in theirs.
"We were noticing a disparity in areas of the city inundated with satellite dishes. You don't see this in Chestnut Hill, Society Hill," Carter said, adding that more dishes are seen in areas with more renters.
Philly has more than 100,000 dish users and was the first city to pass such a measure.
Under the bill, dishes installed in the future must match the colors of homes, and hundreds of inactive dishes will be removed.
The association is also challenging a similar bill in Chicago.
Current single-family-home dish customers won't have to remove dishes but are asked to notify the Department of Licenses and Inspections. For new dish customers, installers must certify in writing if an adequate signal cannot be accessed in locations other than the front of the home.