The numbers have been low for decades. But the issue has taken on new urgency amid news reports that question whether elite colleges discriminate against qualified Asian student applicants lest the schools appear "too Asian," and as recent appointments of Chinese American and Korean American presidents serve to showcase their scarcity.
"Things as they have been done are insufficient," Fong said in an interview at Ursinus, where he recently completed his first semester. "You have to press for change. It can be polite. But you have to be insistent."
It's a paradox: The most educated people in the country, who obtain college degrees at rates far higher than those of whites, blacks, and Hispanics, hold by far the lowest percentage of presidencies. Why?
Some authorities cite a "pipeline problem," meaning that a too-small pool of Asian provosts and vice presidents offers an even more limited number of presidential candidates. Others say it's culture, that many Asians focus on group success instead of individual advancement. And some blame racism reaching all the way back to World War II.
The result, experts say, is that colleges can miss out on leaders who have experience in different cultures, are sensitive to racial concerns, and broadly view the world and its people at a time when campuses are growing ever more diverse.
A 2005 study by the Committee of 100, a nonprofit group of prominent Chinese Americans that studies business, education, and social issues, concluded the "bamboo ceiling" was a reality in higher education and cited a hurtful explanation - stereotypes.