As long as there have been bridges, trolls have hidden beneath them. Same for the Internet.
As long as there have been message boards, discussion groups, and comment strings, there have been "trolls" - people who, under cover of Web anonymity, post bullying, lewd, or off-point comments, disrupting and demeaning the whole enterprise. Some comment strings are moderated, so trolls can be blocked and deleted - but most of cyberspace is, in the words of one (anonymous!) wit, "free range for idiots."
Just one example, to stand for many, from a Harry Potter site: "ENOUGH already with all this Harry Potter [expletive]! What sort of LOSERS think this stuff is cool??? I swear, the little [indelicate term] should be carved up with rusty scythes and his remains poured into a cement mixer. I am so sick and tired of hearing about Harry [extreme epithet] [other extreme epithet] POTTER!"
It's been a problem for years. Julie Spira, an expert on Web etiquette and author of the book Netiquette, says, "It started with some of the early usenet groups, where some of the first 'flame wars' broke out among users."
Some sites - newspapers and entertainment venues - are so encrusted with trolls, like malign barnacles, that comment threads become all but useless. Jolie O'Dell, a reporter for the the tech-business blog VentureBeat, says: "I don't read comments anymore. I've learned there's nothing anyone's going to say that's going to meet me at a professional level of discourse."
Julia Hobsbawm, who runs the British media, analysis, and networking business Electronic Intelligence, says comment strings are "fertile ground for those who prefer to vent spleen rather than offer rigorous, fair, and balanced argument." Spira says: "There's no doubt that anonymity has turned the World Wide Web into the Wild Wild West."
People are looking for solutions. Some, like Gayle Lynn Falkenthal, media columnist for Washington Times Communities, have called for an end to anonymity. "And you should have seen the trollery after I did!" she says from San Diego. "It was jaw-dropping." She says she values the First Amendment, "but any venue with a public responsibility, such as a newspaper, a media site, anything with public money behind it - no place for anonymity there."
