But prosecutors argued that those same friends and neighbors had good reason to be worried.
"This home was not safe for children 15 years ago, and it's not safe for children now," said Deputy Attorney General Jonelle H. Eschbach.
Friday's hearing addressed a hodgepodge of pretrial issues as prosecutors and Sandusky's defense prepare to take the case to trial May 14. Centre County Court Judge John M. Cleland did not make any rulings.
In addition to the question of the former coach's bond conditions, prosecutors renewed their request to have jurors from outside Centre County hear the case, citing the overwhelming pretrial publicity and the important role Penn State and Sandusky's charity, the Second Mile, play in the community.
One in three people in Centre County is either a Penn State student or employed by the university, prosecutor Joseph McGettigan said.
"You're not going to just have people who have read about the case, you're going to have people who bring their own personal information," he said. "They will know from their own experience the places where the crimes occurred. They will know the defendant. They will know kids in Second Mile, or have kids in the Second Mile."
Sandusky's attorney, Joseph Amendola, has opposed the motion, arguing that publicity generated by the case has so saturated the state as to make any distinction in locales irrelevant. Sandusky briefly took the stand Friday as Cleland questioned whether he agreed with his lawyer's advice.
"I don't believe it matters relative to anywhere else in the state," he said. "It's going to come down to the people who are on the jury."
Throughout, the 68-year-old laughed nervously, often seemed unsure of himself, and frequently glanced at Amendola for approval.
"That's just Jerry," the lawyer said later when asked about his client's demeanor on the stand.
Since his arrest in November, Sandusky has denied charges he molested at least 10 boys he met through the Second Mile in alleged incidents in hotel rooms, his home, and on the Penn State campus.
The resulting scandal led to the dismissal of the university's head football coach, Joe Paterno, and the resignation of president Graham B. Spanier. Two other administrators, former vice president Gary Schultz and suspended athletic director Tim Curley, face charges of perjury and failure to report abuse. Both have entered not-guilty pleas.
Since his arrest, Sandusky said, he has endured relentless scrutiny from neighbors, the surrounding community, and the press.
"I can't even take my dog on our deck and throw out biscuits to him," he said after Friday's hearing.
Almost as if offering proof of that constant attention, prosecutors introduced into evidence Friday several videos shot by one of Sandusky's neighbors depicting him on his back porch.
The man had called investigators with concerns about the porch's proximity to nearby Lemont Elementary School. Citing several similar complaints, prosecutors asked Cleland to further limit Sandusky's movements to inside his home.
He has been confined to his property and barred from any contact with children since his release on bond in December.
Anthony Sassano, a state investigator assigned to the case, testified Friday that most complaints had come from parents and teachers at an after-school program on the campus, though no one had reported any specific instances of Sandusky approaching or acting inappropriately toward its children.
"They would comment to the effect of, 'That man is out there again,' " he said, recounting the children's reaction to seeing the former coach on his deck. "Then they would all run over to the window and cause a disruption in the classroom."
Amendola has urged the judge to loosen his client's bond restrictions to allow him visits with grandchildren and close family friends.
Cleland said he would decide the bond question and the issue of an out-of-county jury by early next week.
Contact staff writer Jeremy Roebuck at 267-564-5218, email@example.com, or @jeremyrroebuck on Twitter.