"You want us to sort of apply this old law to new technology," Justice Stephen Breyer said to Charles Rothfeld, the lawyer for Karen A. Capato, the mother of twins fathered by her deceased husband, Robert.
But Justice Antonin Scalia said the court wasn't trying to delve into new technology. "What is at issue here is not whether children that have been born through artificial insemination get benefits. It's whether children who are born after the father's death get benefits," Scalia said.
The Capato twins were born 18 months after their father died of esophageal cancer. Karen Capato applied for survivor benefits on behalf of the twins and was rejected by the Social Security Administration, which said that for them to qualify, Robert Capato needed to be alive during their conception. A federal judge agreed, saying they had to qualify as Capato's child before his death or qualify under state inheritance law as a child who could legally inherit.
Florida law expressly bars children conceived posthumously from inheritance, unless they are named in a will. The only beneficiaries named in Capato's will are his wife, their son and his two children from a previous marriage.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia overturned that decision, saying the Capato twins were clearly the biological children of Robert Capato and deserved the survivor benefits. But other federal appellate courts have ruled differently in similar cases, leaving the Supreme Court to come to a final conclusion.
Some justices noted that ruling for the Caputo twins could cause all types of problems for Social Security benefits.
"What if the Capato twins were born four years after the death in this case?" asked Chief Justice John Roberts. " . . . So what happens if the biological mother remarries or something and then goes through this process?"
The justices will rule later this summer.