The stricter requirements are part of a federal program, known as TRU-ID, to strengthen the security of state-issued licenses and ID cards. Eventually, the federal government says, states must comply with the standards so people can use their cards to board commercial flights or enter federal buildings.
To get the new licenses, people would need to provide a Social Security document and two proofs of residence. Those using passports to meet the requirements could no longer use recently expired documents.
Advocates for immigrants and the homeless object. The ACLU objects largely on privacy grounds and sued in May to halt TRU-ID just before it was to take effect.
The ACLU's case was based on procedural concerns. The state was trying to impose the new requirements without going through the regular rule-making process, which includes gathering public comment.
ACLU lawyer Ed Barocas said state officials seem willing not to require the TRU-ID standards until the regulatory process is completed. The state is interested in other options, he said, such as issuing the more-secure IDs for those who want them.
The Motor Vehicle Commission declined to comment.
Paul Loriquet, a spokesman for the state Attorney General's Office, would not comment beyond what was said in court, but noted that no settlement was presented to the judge.
Under the order extended on Friday, the state cannot yet issue the new kind of identification even to those who may want it.
"Any time the state obtains documents which are personal in nature," Barocas said, "they have to at least state why they're doing so."
If he and the state cannot reach a settlement by Sept. 21, Barocas said, he will ask the judge not to allow any of the new IDs to be issued as long as the dispute remains in court.