Letters: Mayor, run city like a business

Rosa Parks
Rosa Parks
Rosa ParksGALLERY: Rosa Parks
Posted: March 04, 2013

RE: NUTTER-NOMICS.

Mayor Nutter is raising taxes, wants to sell PGW, cutting ribbons, not negotiating with city unions because he is hissy pants that they did not back him for re-election. When he wanted to cut the Mummers parade, Bob Brady saved it. When a construction site has trouble, Brady saves the day. Why do we pay Nutter?

This tax increase is going put a halt to people moving back in to the city, and force people to leave. He starts the 3-1-1 system, which is a waste of money. He wants to spend $50 million and hire 55 employees to get tax money that the city is owed. He wants to close schools, but he wants to hire people. Sounds kind of stupid? City Council seems like a rudderless ship when it comes to ethics. Too bad we did not elect a businessman like Tom Knox instead of the politician we have.

Nutter, it is time to end Council cars, the DROP program and the other burdens that are on taxpayer's backs. In your speech on the state of the city on Feb. 26, you said you wanted to help develop minority businesses. This is good, but don't forget the nonminority businesses that you suck the taxes out of. Mike, run the city like a business not your private little club.

Chris Deluca

Philadelphia

Honoring Rosa Parks

The trials and tribulations Rosa Parks experienced in her lifetime is one entity that sparked the civil-rights movement. Who could've ever imagine that being asked and required to give up one's seat in the front of a public bus would spark social change. But it did.

The new Rosa Parks statue in our nation's Capitol is a welcome tribute. Mrs. Parks is just one year older than my grandmother. Now, when I visit Washington, D.C., I look forward to seeing this newly commissioned addition.

Wayne E. Williams

Camden

Reasonable doubt?

Re: "Trial by social media ought to fail," (Christine Flowers column, Feb. 27).

Christine Flowers, I am appalled that Lt. Josey was acquitted of the crime of simple assault because if it was a woman of another race, he would not have been acquitted of the crime. OK, you represent people of different races during their immigration hearings; that is all well and good but to defend a police officer for committing a crime against a woman is an obstruction of justice in any language.

If a white woman was being beaten by a police officer and it was caught on video camera, do you think that the officer would be exonerated by the judge? (I think not.) How did the officer know that it was the woman, Aida Guzman, who had hit him with a bottle? Why didn't he just arrest her instead of hitting her as if she were a man? If a white person is assaulted, the community comes out in droves to protest the assault. Why should another race be any different?

Shame on you, Christine Flowers, for being insensitive to the needs of others and condoning the acquittal of a police officer who is supposed to protect individuals, not assault them in public. Some police officers give others a bad name just by the way they react to a certain situation. He should never get his job back, if for no other reason than not making a wise decision in his actions.

I may not have been there during the incident but neither were you, so don't make a judgment without reasonable doubt.

Lora Neal

Philadelphia

Gun ban, then socialism

So, Sen. Bob Casey Jr. has decided to pursue an anti-gun agenda (Daily Views, Feb. 22). Like his good friend President Obama, the senator just doesn't get it. The president, like the rest of the Democrat Party, claim to be admirers of President Lincoln and his legacy. Yet he fails to understand that anti-gun laws were created only after Lincoln had freed the slaves.

Southern politicians petitioned Washington to pass a law that would prevent all newly freed slaves from being permitted to own a firearm. These Southern carpetbaggers understood that you can't beat, lynch or burn a cross on the lawn of a black man with a gun. President Lincoln may have freed them, but it was the Second Amendment that gave them the ability to defend that freedom.

President Obama's goal is to strip away this unfair, unjust concept of freedom, and replace it with the great equalizer, socialism. Gun bans are the first step to achieve this. You may not be free, but you will be equal - equally poor, that is. Except of course, for the wealthy elite that will ultimately, under the Democrat plan, dwell only in Washington. And make no mistake, this Washington elite will be allowed to have guns, armed guards, and drones, to protect them, from you, the American citizen.

Stuart Caesar

Philadelphia

|
|
|
|
|