Then over the Labor Day holiday, a Delta flight from New York to Palm Beach, Fla., was rerouted to Jacksonville and a passenger taken off following a recliner conflict.
Let's put this in perspective. Thousands of people fly every day without incident. People recline with no malice intended while many no doubt are uncomfortable when the passenger in front of them reclines the seat. Still, they don't cause such a ruckus that planes have to be diverted.
But make no mistake, recliner rage is a problem. When I wrote about my take on the subject, my email inbox filled up with people venting about the issue. People have been taking sides on Twitter.
"Wait. So the seat reclines, I paid for it, and now I'm not supposed to be able to recline? Really? This is DUMB," Roland Martin, host of TV One's daily morning show, wrote on Twitter.
Some people say they recline because if they don't, they experience discomfort. Others complained about their long legs being crushed, arguing that they too have a right to the space in front of them.
"I also fly a bit and am rather tall, so I literally 'feel the pain' every time I fly," wrote Scott Billigmeier of Leesburg, Va.
A number of people, even those who say they get upset with passengers who recline, felt the rage needs to be directed at the airline industry, not toward fellow fliers. Airlines have reduced seat space, and some are planning to install even slimmer seats to pack in more passengers.
In a survey released this summer by TripAdvisor, the top complaint by travelers was uncomfortable seats or the lack of legroom, which trumped grievances about costly ticket prices and airline fees. This should tell the airlines something.
"Airlines have been steadily shrinking the amount of seat space allotted per passenger in order to cram in more seats and maximize profits," Peter Barnes of Greenfield, Mass., wrote to me in an email. "A reclining seat reclaims a small bit of this space. As has always been the case, an increasingly disempowered class of consumers squabbles among themselves while a deregulated industry does what it pleases. . . . It's the airlines that should be the targets of our anger."
One reader put another economical albeit spot-on sarcastic spin on the recliner fighting.
"The airlines sell the space behind seats twice: (1) to the person behind the seat and (2) to the person sitting in the seat," Russell Faeges, an adjunct sociology instructor at the University of Notre Dame, wrote in an email.
When people recline, they are using space behind their seat that the person behind them has also paid for, Faeges argued. "What surprises me is that the airlines haven't yet instituted sales of reclining seats. They are leaving money on the table."
So why haven't we demanded more comfortable space by protesting with the lack of our business? I know, when I can, I drive or take a train because flying has become so frustrating and cramped.
"We're a captive audience and the airlines know it and take full advantage," Maureen McArdle of Annapolis, Md., wrote in an email. "As long as we passengers are fighting each other instead of banding together to fight the way we're treated by companies to whom we are paying more for less, the airlines can keep laughing all the way to the bank."