BUSINESS
January 24, 1993 | By Marian Uhlman, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER
It was boom times last year for Lemmon Co. And the Sellersville generic-drug maker has U.S. patent laws to thank. The company launched seven new medicines in 1992 - more than ever before. But each was a copy of a drug that had been made only as a brand-name drug - that is, until their patents expired recently. So successful were Lemmon's new products that the company's sales grew by 40 percent last year, transforming the 46-year-old company into a major generic-drug maker, with annual sales of $100 million.
NEWS
October 30, 2001
I'M AN admirer of Michelle Malkin, but I'm disturbed by her drug industry column of Oct. 18. First I would ask, how many shares of drug industry stock does she have in her portfolio. Second, how can an industry that makes multi-billions in profits, spend hundreds of million in advertising, another hundreds of million buying off generic drug makers and pay in the hundreds of million for campaign financing then cry poor mouth when questioned about the cost of their drugs to the working class and poor of this nation?
NEWS
December 6, 1989 | By Lini S. Kadaba, Inquirer Staff Writer
After only a few minutes of listening to Dr. Emerita T. Gueson, the 20 Natural Food Association members prepared to wage a battle against the multimillion-dollar generic-drug industry. As Gueson spoke Thursday about the hazards of generic drugs, Felicia Schnipper, executive director of the association, prepared a petition calling for better industry controls. "Generic drugs are not the same as brand-name drugs," said Gueson, an outspoken physician with obstetrics/gynecology practices at Nazareth Hospital in the Northeast and Holy Redeemer Hospital in Montgomery County.
BUSINESS
January 17, 1991 | By Donna Shaw, Inquirer Staff Writer
Saying that "the generic-drug scandal is not abating," Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.) yesterday criticized the Food and Drug Administration after two makers of generic drugs admitted further improprieties. Pharmaceutical Basic Inc., of Denver, and Duramed Pharmaceuticals, of Cincinnati, said they were withdrawing more of their products from the market. Pharmaceutical Basic was barred from doing business with the Defense Department during 1990 because of a bribery scandal and was reinstated to the government contractors' list only two weeks ago. It said it was halting distribution of all its products after discovering new evidence of falsifications by its employees in documents being submitted to the FDA. In 1989 and last year, two Pharmaceutical Basic officials pleaded guilty to bribing FDA employees in an attempt to gain rapid approvals of generic drugs.
BUSINESS
August 27, 1989 | By Marian Uhlman, Inquirer Staff Writer
Soon after one competitor conceded it had cheated in testing its generic version of SmithKline Beecham's Dyazide and the same day similar concerns were raised about another rival, SmithKline lashed out. "This news certainly reaffirms the necessity for dispensing your Dyazide prescriptions with the branded product," SmithKline wrote pharmacists amid the revelations that its high-blood-pressure medication had been substituted for the generic version...
BUSINESS
September 12, 1989 | By Marian Uhlman, Inquirer Staff Writer
The troubles hounding the generic-drug industry deepened yesterday when Food and Drug Administration inspectors told a congressional subcommittee that they had found a multitude of manufacturing problems in 11 of 13 firms under investigation. The problems outlined to the House Energy and Commerce investigations subcommittee included sloppy record-keeping, inconsistent test data, poor production practices and falsified information submitted to the FDA. The violations varied among the 11 firms.
NEWS
December 20, 1990 | By David Hess, Inquirer Washington Bureau
Serious problems of fraud and other misconduct remain in the generic-drug industry despite a two-year federal investigation, officials said yesterday. Generic drugs are lower-cost substitutes for brand-name prescription drugs. Federal regulations require that generics be equivalent to the higher-priced brand names, both in terms of their effectiveness in treating illnesses and their shelf life. Many doctors routinely prescribe generics to help patients save money. Federal authorities, in their investigation, found that some generic-drug officials were bribing Food and Drug Administration officers to speed approval of inadequately tested products.
BUSINESS
October 12, 2003 | By Linda Loyd INQUIRER STAFF WRITER
Driven by health insurers' push for lower-cost prescription drugs and expiring patents on top-selling brand-name medicines, makers of generic drugs have come into their own. "Once the 98-pound weaklings of the pharmaceutical industry," said Standard & Poor's analyst Arthur Wong, generic-drug companies now are competing aggressively and giving giant pharmaceutical companies "a run for their money. " And their drugs. Generics account for 42 percent of all prescriptions dispensed, and that number should inch up in the coming years, according to Doug Long, vice president of industry relations for IMS Health, a health-care information company with major operations in Plymouth Meeting.
BUSINESS
November 19, 1989 | By Marian Uhlman, Inquirer Staff Writer
The confusion is still there. It doesn't matter that for months the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has investigated the generic-drug industry and so far concluded that only a handful of companies were involved in wrongdoing. The industry continues to wrestle with image problems caused by revelations of falsified test results, sloppy record-keeping and other mismanagement. At Germantown Pharmacy in Philadelphia, customers have become increasingly nervous about generics, the discount drugs that are almost identical to more expensive brand-name versions.
BUSINESS
September 10, 1989 | By Marian Uhlman, Inquirer Staff Writer
The reputation of generic drugs partly hangs on the outcome of tests being done in Philadelphia and about a dozen other cities in the United States. So far, it seems, the tests are not further soiling the name of generics. The generic drugs analyzed at the Philadelphia office of the Food and Drug Administration haven't triggered any alarm bells that would suggest they have been improperly made, FDA officials say. The same holds for tests at the other labs of the FDA, which is continuing to test samples of about 75 percent of the most-prescribed generic drugs.