NEWS
May 25, 2012 | By Bruce Ledewitz
Lost in the relief over the seeming resolution of the status of indicted state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin is the illegality of the court's suspension of her and its threat of further legal action. Which is the greater threat to the rule of law: a single justice who may have mixed politics with state business, or a court that ignores the constitutional structures voters put in place to rein it in? Last week, a grand jury in Pittsburgh handed up charges that Melvin improperly used her staff for political activities on state time.
NEWS
May 20, 2012 | By Matt Katz, Inquirer Trenton Bureau
ATLANTIC CITY - New Jersey's chief justice didn't opine on the extraordinary upheaval and political controversies in the state's court system Friday during his annual "State of the Judiciary" speech at the state's bar association convention. But the new president of the New Jersey State Bar Association most certainly did, in an interview slamming as "borderline unethical" Republican Gov. Christie's recent criticism of one judge's ruling. In introducing the chief justice, bar president Kevin P. McCann, a Democrat with a practice in Bridgeton, told the gathering that judges should not be "looking over their shoulder" or "second-guessed by someone else.
NEWS
May 20, 2012 | By Paula Reed Ward and Angela Couloumbis, PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE INQUIRER HARRISBURG BUREAU
PITTSBURGH - State Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin, stripped of her duties, vowed to fight the criminal charges filed against her Friday and said she had no plans to quit Pennsylvania's highest court. "My faith will see me through this," Melvin said outside the Municipal Court Building. She denied what she called "these politically motivated charges. " The charges brought by Allegheny County prosecutors involve use of taxpayer-paid staff for political campaigning - and are rooted in evidence that emerged in the case against Melvin's sister, State Sen. Jane Orie, convicted in March of similar charges.
NEWS
May 19, 2012 | By Michael A. Fuoco, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Joan Orie Melvin's trajectory as a jurist had been ambitiously, relentlessly celestial - from Pittsburgh city magistrate in 1985 to a seat on the state's highest court by 2010. But on Friday, her plummet was precipitous. Again, she appeared in Pittsburgh City Court, but this time on the other side of the bar. Such a fall was particularly dramatic for a woman whose life had been one of achievements and firsts. Melvin, 56, of Marshal, Pa., grew up as one of nine competitive, sports-oriented siblings whose first names all begin with J. Raised by a doctor and an extroverted homemaker mother, all became successes: five lawyers, two cardiologists, an educator, and a human resources manager.
NEWS
May 13, 2012 | Reviewed by David Kairys
Rights at Risk The Limits of Liberty in Modern America By David K. Shipler Alfred A. Knopf. 400 pp. $28.95 Best-selling author and Pulitzer Prize winner David Shipler believes America has "lost its way" since 9/11. "Constitutional rights are routinely overwhelmed," he says in his new book, Rights at Risk, "largely out of sight in criminal courts and interrogation rooms, in offices of prosecutors and immigration bureaucrats, and in schools. " While we talk about freedom and liberty a lot, there has been little opposition as the Patriot Act empowered the federal government to ask store owners what books we buy and what videos we rent, and to compile these and our political preferences in government files.
BUSINESS
May 7, 2012 | Joe DiStefano
Immigrant millionaire Stephen Girard's 1830 will has benefited generations of Pennsylvanians: students at Girard College, the free North Philadelphia boarding school his legacy still supports, and the lawyers who have been fighting over the will and Girard Estate funds since his death. The latest challenge will go before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday. Lawyers for the Girard Estate, which is administered by the Philadelphia Board of City Trusts, are fighting to protect its state tax exemptions.
NEWS
May 1, 2012 | Inquirer Editorial
Questions and comments made by several justices during last week's oral arguments suggested the Supreme Court might validate that portion of a controversial Arizona law that would allow local police to question persons suspected of other crimes about their immigration status. The court wouldn't consider the likelihood that such questioning might violate the questioned person's civil rights because that is the subject of separate litigation. The justices are limited to ruling on the constitutionality of specific issues brought before the high court, so they also didn't comment on the morality of the Arizona law and others like it either proposed or enacted in other states.
NEWS
April 25, 2012 | By Michael Matza, Inquirer Staff Writer
Taking their long-running battle to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, Arizona and the federal government are set to square off over the state's bitterly disputed 2010 law designed to crack down on illegal immigration. Among the law's most contested provisions are expanded powers for local police to demand proof of the immigration status of anyone they stop, and to arrest, without a warrant, those they suspect of being here illegally. Advocates for immigrants say such powers invite discriminatory racial profiling based on skin color and foreign accents.
NEWS
April 24, 2012 | By Craig R. McCoy
Philadelphia should cap off its overhaul of its court system by creating indicting grand juries and trying fugitive defendants in absentia, a veteran former prosecutor said Monday. In a double-barreled presentation to a state Senate advisory panel, Walter M. Phillips Jr. said the moves would crack down on witness intimidation and send a strong signal encouraging defendants to show up for court. Phillips detailed his proposals at the latest session of a volunteer panel of judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers, academics, and other experts established to recommend changes to the Philadelphia courts in response to an Inquirer investigative series, "Justice: Delayed, Dismissed, Denied.