June 15, 2016
ISSUE | JUDICIARY Trump's slurs unfair Our nation's founders understood that judges who apply the law fairly and independently are essential to maintaining a just society. The Constitution established a judicial system in which judges make decisions based on a case's merits without fear of being fired, demoted, or sued. Judicial independence helps ensure that parties receive fair hearing without influence by government, politicians, or others. It was shocking when Donald Trump attacked the impartiality of a U.S. District Court judge hearing the case against Trump University because of his "Mexican heritage" ("Trump's attacks on judge spark concern," June 5)
May 19, 2013 |
ATLANTIC CITY - In an unusually pointed response to Gov. Christie's frequent excoriation of the judiciary, state Supreme Court Justice Barry T. Albin asserted in a speech Friday that politicians' criticism of judicial decisions undermines democracy and weakens public confidence in the court. Albin, whom Christie has criticized by name, was the lead speaker at a New Jersey State Bar Association panel on judicial independence. Open criticism of judges' decisions could cause others to fear for their careers and undercut the ability of jurists throughout the system to render impartial judgments, he said.
March 26, 2013 |
The New Jersey Supreme Court, once viewed as a bastion of independent, if liberal, jurisprudence, risks a sharply diminished reputation if political battles over filling its empty seats are not quickly resolved, legal experts and court-reform advocates say. The immediate issue facing the court is the maneuvering between Gov. Christie and Senate Democrats over the two unfilled positions. But experts say the larger issue is the breakdown of an informal, decades-old agreement between the parties to minimize partisan wrangling over judicial nominees.
June 17, 2012 |
"Contagion is back with a vengeance, and Italy is bearing the brunt of the fallout from Spain's request for external assistance. " — Sovereign-debt expert Nicholas Spiro, on the European financial crisis. "Our role is to say what is possible under EU law. We are not scriptwriters for disaster films. " — Olivier Bailly, a European Commission spokesman, on the possibility of a Greek euro exit. "In the midst of the crisis abroad, the news in Colombia remains favorable.
November 2, 2007 |
Two days after she harshly criticized a Philadelphia judge who reduced a rape charge to "theft of services" because the victim was a prostitute, the head of the city's bar association is herself the target of lawyers for attacking "the independence of the judiciary. " "Absolutely inappropriate," veteran Center City defense lawyer George H. Newman said yesterday, referring to Tuesday's statement by bar Chancellor Jane Leslie Dalton criticizing Municipal Court Judge Teresa Carr Deni.
October 4, 2007 |
Commonwealth Court Judge James Gardner Colins, the longest-serving judge in the 37-year history of the court, will step down in January to devote himself to defending judicial independence, he said. Colins, 61, said that after 23 years on the Commonwealth Court and four years on Philadelphia Municipal Court, it was "time to move on. " In an interview yesterday, Colins said he looked forward to taking up the cause of what he said was an "increasing threat to the independence of the judiciary.
September 20, 2006
SHOULD JUDGES BE judging the judges . . . especially when it comes to determining how much they should earn? Last week's state Supreme Court decision that reinstated pay raises for commonwealth judges has spurred many taxpayers to ask that question. The fact is, answering that question is relatively simple, legally speaking. But the other questions that last week's decision raises may not be so simply resolved. The judges' decision is the latest chapter in what can charitably called the Legislative Pay Raise Debacle, when Harrisburg lawmakers last year gave themselves and the judges pay raises in the middle of the night, absent any public hearings.
June 5, 2006 |
U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III could have taken the safe route and retreated to the privacy of the courthouse after issuing his landmark ruling in December against intelligent design. Most judges are loath to go public about their cases at all, let alone respond to their critics. But Jones - angered by accusations that he had betrayed the conservative cause with his ruling, and disturbed by the growing number of politically motivated attacks on judges in general - came out from his chambers swinging.
March 21, 2006
Just imagine trying to evict an old bachelor judge from his ancestral farmhouse. That one stunt is proof that attacks on the independence of America's judiciary have gone too far. Good thing for U.S. Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter that most voters in his New Hampshire hometown last week turned against the idea of seizing his house. The justice can breathe a sigh of relief, even if he knew all along that the proposed seizure would never stand up in court, that the intent was symbolic punishment.
December 30, 2005
TRIAL judges from all across Pennsylvania have sued to restore the judicial compensation provisions repealed by the Legislature in November. The repeal bill, as applied to judicial salaries, violates the Pennsylvania Constitution since it reduces the salaries of sitting judges without similarly reducing the salaries of all other "salaried officers of the Commonwealth. " The issues raised by the judicial compensation provisions in the July pay raise and November repeal bills are not the same as the issues involving legislative pay raises that made people so angry.