NEWS
December 21, 1989 | By Scott Heimer and Gina Boubion, Daily News Staff Writers The Associated Press contributed to this report
Panamanians despise drug-dealing dictator Manuel Noriega, but may resent just as strongly the American military assault on their country, some experts say. Others argue that Panama's new U.S.-installed democratic government might take root and have Panamanians thanking President Bush for the invasion that removed Noriega from power. That was a cross-section of the early reaction yesterday as U.S. forces moved to consolidate control in Panama - and searched for the elusive Noriega.
NEWS
January 26, 1987 | From Inquirer Wire Services
The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said yesterday that President Reagan should consider military action in the latest kidnapping of three Americans in Beirut if the hostage-takers carry out a threat to kill the U.S. citizens. Sen. Claiborne Pell (D., R.I.) said Reagan should take "pretty hard" action against Iran if there is "clear evidence" that Iran is behind the latest kidnapping, which occurred Saturday. However, Pell added, "if it's a group without any government connection, then . . . there really is no good solution.
NEWS
October 19, 2011 | By Abdi Guled, Associated Press
MOGADISHU, Somalia - A suicide car bomb exploded near Somalia's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday, killing at least four people even as Somalian and Kenyan leaders met and agreed to cooperate on military action against Islamist insurgents. The blast rattled central Mogadishu and killed at least three passersby and the suicide bomber, police official Ali Hassan said. Six people were wounded and taken to the hospital, he said. The explosion did not damage the ministry building but did take down a stone wall in front of it. "The car bomb blew up among people and cars passing down the street," said Mohamed Nor Siyaed, an eyewitness.
NEWS
February 18, 1998
Yesterday, as American troops streamed into the Persian Gulf, as the political rhetoric sharpened and diplomatic movement intensified, President Clinton had an obligation to explain why the United States isn't backing down from its confrontation with Iraq. That he did, in a forthright public defense of his administration's assessment that Saddam Hussein's refusal to comply with U.N. weapons inspections poses a dire threat to national interests and world stability. Mr. Clinton was less convincing that the best way to confront the rogue Iraqi leader is with unilateral military action.
NEWS
March 26, 1999
Once again - this time in Yugoslavia - Americans are being asked to rally 'round the flag for the sake of our young men and women in harm's way. And once again, as in Iraq, we have no choice but to support the military action, even if we are uneasy about why our young men and women are in harm's way. It's a terrible dilemma . . . And a tragic irony. In Yugoslavia, the only apparent alternative to NATO military action is to stand by and let thousands of people be massacred - something we cannot do. There are similarities between the U.S. positions in Iraq and Yugoslavia.
NEWS
January 20, 1993 | By Dick Polman, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER Inquirer wire services contributed to this article
Growing unease about new U.S.-led attacks on Iraq, and the resulting civilian casualties, is dividing the coalition allied against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Leaders in Britain, France, Italy, Russia and the Netherlands yesterday expressed concern about the renewed bombing of Iraq, and the Vatican, criticizing allied "overreaction," said it would ask the United Nations to halt military action. Iraq says at least 46 people have been killed in the raids. In Britain, which has been the United States' staunchest ally in the Persian Gulf, Prime Minister John Major told Parliament yesterday that the allies would use only "the minimum necessary force.
NEWS
January 9, 1986 | By Robert J. Rosenthal, Inquirer Staff Writer
In the short term, days or even months, President Reagan's decision to impose sanctions against Libya may deter Moammar Khadafy and the terrorists he allows to train and live on Libyan soil, intelligence analysts here believe. But in the long term, they say, the sanctions are meaningless unless they are backed up by direct military or covert action against the Khadafy regime and the organizations of terrorists such as Abu Nidal. Israeli military and intelligence sources interviewed here this week argue that the elimination of Abu Nidal would be the most efficient and best use of force, but they caution that a strike at Libya and the terrorists it harbors would be impossible without risking all-out war. The U.S. sanctions as well as repeated Israeli warnings of retaliation against Libya are a direct response to the Palestinian terrorist attacks at airports in Rome and Vienna, Austria, on Dec. 27. The attacks, which resulted in 19 deaths, have been blamed by Israel and the United States on Abu Nidal, whose whereabouts and methods of operation remain largely a mystery.
NEWS
May 13, 1994 | By Christopher Marquis, INQUIRER WASHINGTON BUREAU
The Clinton administration is provoking more opposition than approval among other nations as it explores the possibility of using military force to oust Haiti's military rulers, diplomats said yesterday. The United States has nonetheless found support for action from Caribbean nations and Argentina, where diplomats argue that human rights concerns and Haitians' right to self-determination should outweigh anti-interventionist sentiments. But France, Canada and other key U.S. allies in the drive to restore democracy to Haiti warn against military action.
NEWS
February 13, 2002 | By Warren P. Strobel and John Walcott INQUIRER WASHINGTON BUREAU
President Bush has decided to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein from power and ordered the CIA, the Pentagon and other agencies to devise a combination of military, diplomatic and covert steps to achieve that goal, senior U.S. officials said yesterday. No military strike is imminent, but Bush has concluded that Hussein and his nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs are such a threat to U.S. security that the Iraqi dictator must be removed, even if U.S. allies do not help, said the officials, who all spoke on condition of anonymity.
NEWS
February 10, 1998 | By Bradley Graham, WASHINGTON POST Richard Parker, Robert A. Rankin and David Hess of the Inquirer Washington Bureau contributed to this article
The United States plans to send up to 3,000 additional Army soldiers to Kuwait to shore up defenses here and discourage Iraq from attempting any retaliatory attack in the event of U.S. and British air strikes, a senior American military official reported yesterday. The announcement marked the latest in a sudden series of fresh deployments to the Persian Gulf region, signaling intensified preparations for military action even as U.S. officials continue to hold open the prospect of a diplomatic solution to the confrontation with Iraq over access by U.N. inspectors to suspected weapons sites.