July 26, 2012 |
NEW YORK - Pioneering astronaut Sally Ride, who relished privacy as much as she did adventure, chose an appropriately discreet manner of coming out. At the end of an obituary that she cowrote with her partner, Tam O'Shaughnessy, they disclosed to the world their relationship of 27 years. That was it. As details trickled out after Ride's death Monday, it became clear that a circle of family, friends, and coworkers had long known of the relationship and embraced it. For millions of others, who admired Ride as the first American woman in space, it was a revelation - and it sparked a discussion about privacy vs. public candor in regard to sexual orientation.
June 14, 2012 |
Question: How much privacy should a married couple, of 20-plus years, have from each other? Do you believe a spouse should have private passwords to computer, e-mail, phone, Facebook, etc., and private conversations on the phone? This is a very big bone of contention between my spouse and me, and I would really like your unbiased opinion. Answer: I think the details of passwords, etc., matter less than what you do with them and how trustworthy each of you thinks the other is. Four examples: 1. Couples can have private conversations and passwords they don't share, just because they believe in privacy and individuality, even if they have nothing to hide.
May 26, 2012 |
Americans who pick up the phone to call overseas have no way of knowing whether they're on the modern-day equivalent of a party line. For that, they can blame the unwarranted expansion of U.S. antiterrorism surveillance in the wake of 9/11. More than a decade after the terror attacks, the constitutionality of spying on untold numbers of likely innocent citizens — including by monitoring their e-mail messages — has yet to be tested by the courts. Now, though, the Supreme Court could clear the way for that long-overdue legal review with a ruling granting citizens the right to challenge secret wiretapping of international calls and messages out of the plausible fear that their privacy rights are being breached.
May 23, 2012 |
Even the 30-day prison sentence given to a former Rutgers University student who used a webcam to secretly record his roommate having a romantic encounter with another man may have been too much. Many legal experts agree that Dharun Ravi, 20, probably wouldn't have been charged with any crime had not his victim, Tyler Clementi, committed suicide two days after the September 2010 incident. Even so, there was no evidence that Ravi's despicable act directly triggered Clementi's death.
May 3, 2012 |
When Dave Clarke wants to fill a position at AuthenticMatters in Old City, he sifts through the stack of resumes and looks up candidates on Google. He expects a presence online, he says, especially considering the company's work — digital strategy and communications consultancy. "That's your online resume," AuthenticMatters' founder says of tweets, blogs, and status updates. "It's not what you attach to an e-mail. "We're not digging for dirt or hunting for drunken photos or anything," he continues.
March 16, 2012
Here is a verdict sheet for Dahrun Ravi in the Rutgers webcam spying case. T.C. is Tyler Clementi. M.B. is the man he was with during the spying incident. Some counts have more than one element, but Ravi only had to be convicted on one element to be guilty of the charge. Count 1 Fourth-Degree Invasion of Privacy, related to T.C.: GUILTY Fourth-Degree Invasion of Privacy, related to T.C.'s guest, M.B.: GUILTY Count 2 Third-Degree Bias Intimidation - Invasion of Privacy with the purpose to intimidate T.C. because of sexual orientation: NOT GUILTY - Invasion of Privacy with the purpose to intimidate M.B. because of sexual orientation: NOT GUILTY - Invasion of Privacy, knowing that the conduct constituting invasion of privacy would cause T.C. to be intimidated because of sexual orientation: NOT GUILTY - Invasion of Privacy, knowing that the conduct constituting invasion of privacy would cause M.B. to be intimidated because of sexual orientation: NOT GUILTY - Invasion of Privacy, under circumstances that caused T.C. to be intimidated, and considering the manner in which the offense was committed, T.C. reasonably believed that he was selected to be the target of the offense because of sexual orientation: GUILTY Count 3 Third-Degree Invasion of Privacy, related to T.C.: GUILTY Third-Degree Invasion of Privacy, related to M.B.: GUILTY ...
March 13, 2012 |
Kathryn Segesser says she believes the current thinking about eating disorders may be wrong. Segesser suspects that for centuries, anorexia and bulimia have afflicted both men and women. She would like to challenge the popular theory that blames modern cultural pressures and unrealistic images of beauty projected by lollipop-thin models. "I'm trying to see if, in the 18th century, people understood that there was some psychological reason that people decided not to eat," Segesser said.
March 11, 2012 |
March 8, 2012 |
NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. - "Yes," Dharun Ravi said in a videotaped police interview played for jurors Wednesday, he violated his Rutgers University roommate's privacy by viewing him in an intimate moment with another man. But, he said, he didn't mean any harm: "I didn't realize it was something so private," Ravi said. "It was my room, too. " The recorded interview was the first time jurors have heard Ravi's voice in his trial, which has lasted nine days. Ravi faces 15 criminal charges, including invasion of privacy, bias intimidation, and tampering with evidence and a witness.