NEWS
May 20, 2012 | By Matt Katz, Inquirer Trenton Bureau
ATLANTIC CITY - New Jersey's chief justice didn't opine on the extraordinary upheaval and political controversies in the state's court system Friday during his annual "State of the Judiciary" speech at the state's bar association convention. But the new president of the New Jersey State Bar Association most certainly did, in an interview slamming as "borderline unethical" Republican Gov. Christie's recent criticism of one judge's ruling. In introducing the chief justice, bar president Kevin P. McCann, a Democrat with a practice in Bridgeton, told the gathering that judges should not be "looking over their shoulder" or "second-guessed by someone else.
NEWS
May 19, 2012 | By Paula Reed Ward, PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE
and Angela Couloumbis INQUIRER HARRISBURG BUREAU PITTSBURGH - State Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin, stripped of her duties, is vowing to fight the criminal charges filed against her Friday by Allegheny County prosecutors. The charges involve the use of taxpayer-paid staff for political campaigning. Melvin is facing nine criminal counts, including theft of services and conspiracy to tamper with evidence - all in connection with allegations she used her state-funded staff to perform campaign work.
NEWS
May 16, 2007
Nominating two in each party. Democratic Bucks 47 3,419 10,997 5,130 5,641 Chester 61 1,538 4,707 4,273 3,754 Delaware 95 4,854 13,023 10,581 8,116 Montgomery 51 4,012 11,736 9,612 5,844 Philadelphia 96 58,157 118,865 50,755 89,937 Statewide 75 171,818 337,966 365,525 201,892 ...
NEWS
March 30, 1993 | by Phil Rosenthal, Los Angeles Daily News
More than a week has passed since it was learned there would be an imminent opening on the U.S. Supreme Court, and America's best-known judge has yet to hear from America's best-known saxophone player. "I'm not a confidant of the president, even though I did go to the inauguration," said Joseph A. Wapner, who presides over TV's "The People's Court. " "I don't know him. I've never met him. I don't know how he thinks about the Supreme Court. I'm hopeful about his appointment, but I don't know any more than you. " So, the question begs, why not Wapner?
NEWS
May 4, 1987
While breaches of ethics and conflicts of interest have seemed endemic to the executive and legislative branches of the federal government, the Supreme Court normally manages to steer clear of such tawdry behavior. Its members stay out of the public eye and conduct their deliberations behind closed doors. They go so far as to avoid giving speeches to partisans of one side of an issue that may come before the court. Whatever the justices' politics when they took the bench, whatever their written opinions, the court as institution has managed to retain the image of a neutral island in a partisan sea. That's why it's so hard to absorb how Justice Sandra Day O'Connor could have contemplated giving a special private briefing at the Supreme Court to big donors to the Republican Party.
NEWS
February 2, 2002 | By JACK M. BALKIN
HUMAN CLONING and hate crimes would seem to have little in common. But in a series of shortsighted decisions on the constitutional limits of congressional power, the U.S. Supreme Court has managed to make it harder to ban cloning as well as hate crimes. This will no doubt come as a surprise to opponents of abortion, who oppose cloning on a moral basis and are eager to outlaw it. Since the New Deal, Congress has been free to regulate any activity that had substantial effects on interstate commerce.
NEWS
July 11, 1991 | Charles Fried, From the New York Times
The retirement of Justice Thurgood Marshall and the nomination of U.S. Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas does no more than mark the end of a transition that began with the appointment of Chief Justice Warren Burger in 1969. But we should not for that reason expect a court that is monolithic, predictable and even illiberal - in the historic sense of the word. What can we expect from the next Supreme Court? It is likely that the disputes will center on the structure of government and the limits of its power to control individual and group choice.
SPORTS
June 28, 2009 | THE INQUIRER STAFF
In the legal equivalent of running up the score, the NFL is going to the Supreme Court in search of a bigger victory in an antitrust tussle over team merchandise than it already won from a lower court. The Supreme Court could decide as early as tomorrow whether it will hear the case, which involves American Needle Inc.'s challenge to the league's exclusive contract for selling headwear such as caps and hats with team logos on them. American Needle of Buffalo Grove, Ill., also is urging the high court to review.
NEWS
April 24, 2012 | By Anna Harvey
President Obama recently came under fire for suggesting the Supreme Court should defer to the "democratically elected Congress" that enacted the health-care law. One critic, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, said, "The American people should be able to expect that their president will defend the independence of the court, not undermine it. " While we don't know how the justices will rule this summer, the president's remarks actually reflect...